Subject: "Afflict vs. Harm" Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #2064
Show all folders

Graatch (inactive user)Sat 23-Aug-03 07:52 PM
Charter member
posts
#2064, "Afflict vs. Harm"


          

Not to argue with an Implementor, but, harm was not 'ass' as much as you might think.

When I played Farnsworth recently I noticed that there is a class of mobs who were immune to demonfire, immune to dispel evil, and pretty much immune to everything I could do... except harm.

Harm work(ed?) against several things that nothing else did, for instance a whole host of hell mobs. Other mobs too, such as certain undead and of course many neutral mobs. I am sure you can figure these out yourselves without me having to list them.

So the question is, does the new Afflict work as harm did, and affect in the same way, or did shamen lose the ability to harm certain mobs now?

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

TopicAfflict vs. Harm [View all] , Graatch (inactive user), Sat 23-Aug-03 07:52 PM
Reply RE: Afflict vs. Harm, Valguarnera, 23-Aug-03 08:26 PM, #1
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #2064 Previous topic | Next topic