Odrirg | Fri 15-Apr-05 01:20 PM |
Member since 16th Oct 2004
431 posts
| |
|
#723, "sorry for getting off-subject"
|
I hate having to disagree with you.
but,in my opinion, if option A is true, your last stipulation of option A (god doesn't actually create the absolute moral principle) is invalid.
Why? Well, Let's say there are absolute moral principles, which are universal moral laws not unlike the Universal laws of Physics....for example Gravity or the speed of light.
Well, A good working defenition of "God", in my opinion, is an entity that created the universe, which would include the laws of physics (and by extension, in option A) the universal laws of Morality.
Sure, you can say god never had to "Reveal" the physical laws to mankind....but I can say that he did.
How? By giving us senses by which to observe them. We have mass and senses and can observe gravity at work. It can also be said that we have internal senses that can observe the universal "Moral" rules at work.
I understand your argument comes from my statement that the religious view is that "murder is wrong because God sais it's wrong, period."
And that lead to your option B. but I think it goes deeper than that.
Did God say it was wrong just because? or did God say it was wrong because he MADE it wrong, as in Option A.
Also, for many religious people, option B isn't valid for another reason. For a God that created the universe, and Time, he is also OUTSIDE of time. He is also perfect and flawless (there is a debate whether his omniscience springs from his being outside of time and perfect....or if his being outside of time and perfect springs from him being omniscient....or if such a causality relationship between these aspects of him is even valid to consider).
Meaning, he does not change. Yes, mortal PERCEPTION of him can change. And his specific rules for specific groups of people can change as those specific groups grow and change, but the basic MORALITY RULES, can't change. He can't change his mind and say that setting children on fire is Morally right....because that would mean he was Wrong before when he said that it was Morally wrong, And God, by the definition many religous people go by, can't be wrong.
|
|
|
Paladins
[View all] , Vandir, Tue 12-Apr-05 05:07 PM
The Paladin Code,
Aarn,
21-Apr-05 02:24 PM, #42
My approach,
Innis,
21-Apr-05 01:30 PM, #41
RE: Paladins,
Zulghinlour,
19-Apr-05 04:39 PM, #32
Agreed,
Theerkla,
20-Apr-05 06:59 AM, #34
RE: Agreed,
Grurk Muouk,
20-Apr-05 11:35 AM, #37
The thing is, Grurk has a red aura,
Theerkla,
20-Apr-05 11:53 AM, #38
Whatever works for your char's role.,
Alarian,
20-Apr-05 01:48 PM, #39
Here's how I did it as a mortal.,
Alarian,
17-Apr-05 07:17 PM, #30
RE: Paladins,
nepenthe,
12-Apr-05 05:36 PM, #1
On that note...,
Aarn,
12-Apr-05 06:34 PM, #2
Well, as someone that tries,
incognito,
12-Apr-05 06:45 PM, #3
RE: Well, as someone that tries,
Aarn,
13-Apr-05 07:58 AM, #4
RE: Well, as someone that tries,
Rodriguez,
13-Apr-05 11:14 AM, #5
RE: Well, as someone that tries,
Aarn,
13-Apr-05 11:41 AM, #6
So I could say, Rape a nine year old Florida girl, and ...,
(NOT Pro),
13-Apr-05 05:10 PM, #7
I hate you for this post, but,
Wilhath,
13-Apr-05 05:40 PM, #8
his arguments are not mutually exclusive,
incognito,
13-Apr-05 09:36 PM, #10
RE: his arguments are not mutually exclusive,
Wilhath,
14-Apr-05 04:02 PM, #12
Not quite,
Aarn,
13-Apr-05 06:02 PM, #9
It's a different world.,
DurNominator,
14-Apr-05 02:15 PM, #11
Relative vrs. absolute morality,
Alarian,
15-Apr-05 08:41 AM, #13
I hope you get a religion.,
(NOT Pro),
15-Apr-05 12:15 PM, #14
RE: Relative vrs. absolute morality,
DurNominator,
15-Apr-05 12:34 PM, #15
Relative Morality, Real world vs. Game world,
Odrirg,
15-Apr-05 12:54 PM, #16
RE: Relative Morality, Real world vs. Game world,
nepenthe,
15-Apr-05 01:03 PM, #18
sorry for getting off-subject,
Odrirg,
15-Apr-05 01:20 PM #19
Whoa,
Aarn,
15-Apr-05 02:02 PM, #20
Also, to bring it back to Paladins...,
Odrirg,
15-Apr-05 02:12 PM, #21
RE: Also, to bring it back to Paladins...,
A2,
19-Apr-05 04:19 PM, #31
No.,
Odrirg,
19-Apr-05 04:56 PM, #33
RE: No.,
A2,
20-Apr-05 11:30 AM, #36
You're both right.,
Alarian,
20-Apr-05 01:56 PM, #40
Paladins shouldn't associate with evil.,
DurNominator,
20-Apr-05 10:35 AM, #35
You are bass akwards. In a big way.,
(NOT Pro),
15-Apr-05 12:58 PM, #17
RE: You are bass akwards. In a big way.,
Aarn,
15-Apr-05 02:31 PM, #22
If we bring this back to CF.,
DurNominator,
15-Apr-05 03:18 PM, #23
This, I agree with. somewhat.,
Odrirg,
15-Apr-05 03:52 PM, #24
Me too. That's not anathema to what he's saying though.,
(NOT Pro),
15-Apr-05 06:36 PM, #26
That works too.,
DurNominator,
16-Apr-05 12:41 AM, #28
Heh,. Okay. We agree.,
(NOT Pro),
15-Apr-05 06:35 PM, #25
Is this about right?,
Vandir,
15-Apr-05 08:18 PM, #27
I love stuff like this.....,
Alarian,
17-Apr-05 06:59 PM, #29
| |
|