Eskelian | Thu 26-Apr-07 03:51 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
2023 posts
| |
|
#1112, "RE: Let me count the ways...."
|
I appreciate your comments.
I think the interesting thing of our implementation is that it solves a lot of the issues you have concerns with. In our implementation the fingerprint/iris scan is one-way hashed into binary, so (even though its encrypted both in transit and storage), its of no value by itself. You can't get a fingerprint picture or anything back out of it once its stored.
I'm not sure which programs we'll include. I have a feeling we'll rely primarily on Windows permissions, meaning we won't log into your Quickbooks or password protected word documents or whatever. I can't get much into technical details but I'm not worried about false negatives in this scenario (its configurable to high threshold or low threshold depending on environment criterias). I'm more worried about having to log into stuff like Citrix and other third party programs.
Crashing Windows concerns me. Did the crashes happen during login or after?
|
|
|
How hard is it to replace Windows Logon?
[View all] , Eskelian, Thu 26-Apr-07 07:50 AM
RE: How hard is it to replace Windows Logon?,
Marcus_,
26-Apr-07 09:41 AM, #2
RE: How hard is it to replace Windows Logon?,
Eskelian,
26-Apr-07 09:48 AM, #3
My company recently tried one of these products,
Tac,
26-Apr-07 08:11 AM, #1
RE: My company recently tried one of these products,
Eskelian,
26-Apr-07 10:03 AM, #4
Let me count the ways....,
Tac,
26-Apr-07 10:49 AM, #5
RE: Let me count the ways....,
Eskelian,
26-Apr-07 03:51 PM #6
Both. Third party stuff was very buggy.,
Tac,
26-Apr-07 04:02 PM, #7
In all fairness,
Tac,
26-Apr-07 04:09 PM, #8
RE: In all fairness,
Eskelian,
26-Apr-07 11:13 PM, #9
Think Gattaca,
Tac,
27-Apr-07 08:30 AM, #10
| |
|