And I would love to see your role, if it explains why....

But if I were to ever play an outlander again, I definately would put members of the Inn closely behind tribunal and empire as people I wouldn't like.

The whole thing about the inn being out there in the middle of the wild, a cancerous outgrowth of coddling civilization.

And if I were to play a Herald again, I would naturally be extremely wary of anyone who, philosophically, would like to dance upon the ashes of the Inn.

I understand that many of the herald players like to choose the chaotic ethos, but I submit that should not automatically mean "anti-tribunal". And it should definately not mean grouping up with people who would like to see the Inn levelled, so often it earns a Lackey title, *ESPECIALLY* If I chose the "orderly" ethos upon char creation, like you did.


I admit, in the past, I have caught myself with neut/chaotic/uncaballed characters who were inordinatly partial to tribunal/empire because of my past history of Lawful/orderly characters. I knew what to expect from those people, I was comfortable with their range of rp, etc.

I honestly had a suspicion, that such might be the case with an orderly-good transmuter of the Inn who liked to help rampaging neutral outlanders take death and destruction into the City....and seeing that you were Massie...?

What helped me get over this, was playing the other side.

Might I be close to the mark? Again, I'd love to see your role to see what motivated you.