>As for having a tattoo of a god of annihilation... I have
>always taken the word of the Immortals, concerning the freedom
>of roleplay, so long as the idea was not so farfetched as to
>extend into the realm of impossibility. I capitalized on what
>I saw as an oppertunity, and found that the supposedly
>unbiased Imm-staff (not any specific Imm, visible,
>representing their respective religion/cabal) frowned(s) upon
>my attempt to incorporate diversity into my cabal and my
>character. I've always been told not to fight the current,
>but go with it. I suppose I will refrain from making any
>further attempts to create diverse characters, and instead
>roll up a bunch more of my absent-minded PK only characters to
>ensure I end up generating the appropriate pleasure for the
>Immortal.


I'm amazed at how casually you take being tattooed by the god of ****ANNIHILATION****.

Think about it.

You've associated yourself with a force that represents something worse than what the Outlanders represent to Tribunal, was intentionally disrespectful to your superiors, and you didn't expect any negative reprecussions from this???

That's like someone joining the police force, becomming a member of an anarchist death-cult, carving a pentagram on their forehead, being a jerk to their superiors, and then wondering why the heck they got fired.

You seem to be intelligent, though just a *tad* curt. I can't believe you never made the connection.

Freedom of action/rp doesn't mean freedom from consequences, negative as well as positive.

(Yes, I know anarchists are considered chaotic, but historically the actual anarchist movement was quite orderly and organized in their plans for destruction and it was the best RL example I could think of quickly.)