|
|
Calion | Wed 09-Oct-19 01:45 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
373 posts
|    |
|
#73554, "Ranger available terrains & expertises"
|
Looking at the available terrains & expertises for different races, storm giants especially seem way too thematically restricted. In general I think that Forest should basically be a terrain and Survivalist an expertise choice for every race. I.e. less forcing of "common" or "most likely" racial background for rangers, but rather adding more variety/combos to play.
As far as stormies go, besides Forest & Survivalist, adding at least also Marshdweller (keeping with their wet theme) & Explorer seems reasonable (I'm just thinking in terms of expanding their very limited options, not in the skill sets, but I doubt there's an über ranger build in there).
|
|
|
|
|
|
SPN | Thu 10-Oct-19 10:18 PM |
Member since 24th Oct 2004
352 posts
|   |
|
#73556, "If I recall right.."
In response to Reply #0
|
When expertise/terrain changes went in, and they opened up a bunch of new races, they justified not giving those races Forester/survivalist because they were not permitted to be rangers previously. And pre-change rangers we're all forester/survivalists.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Kalageadon | Fri 11-Oct-19 07:56 AM |
Member since 23rd Oct 2003
1049 posts
| |
|
#73558, "Correct."
In response to Reply #2
|
Don't get me wrong though. I can see the argument about opening up a little bit more for the home terrains or expertise though. Marsh really does make a pretty good fit for a Storm and that's just one example.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dallevian | Wed 09-Oct-19 08:27 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
1711 posts
| |
|
#73555, "i always thought storms should be mountaineer"
In response to Reply #0
|
but maybe those stormies on Kiadana are all just warriors or something
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Dallevian | Fri 11-Oct-19 08:31 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
1711 posts
| |
|
#73560, "but they done been at it for 10,000 years! nt"
In response to Reply #3
|
|
|
|
Printer-friendly copy 
Email this topic to a friend 
