|
|
Mekantos | Mon 03-Jan-05 02:00 AM |
Member since 06th Dec 2003
796 posts
| |
|
#6777, "A combat change."
|
I was just hit with the notion that if you get into a fight with a person, and an assisting person tries to bash you and fails (putting them in the sitting or resting position, if I recall correctly), other than being on their bum in the dirt, that person gets no penalty to their attacks. If this is misinformation, just say so.
Anyway, if it is not misinformation could that be changed? I don't see how someone could be attacking if they just tried to bash someone from the side and landed on their face. For at least a round that person's attacks should be stopped. I could see them returning to the battle during the failed bash lag, however, which would result in a gradual return of attack frequency and strength.
Also, this could be used as a weapon, so to speak. A thief using "push" could cause a real problem for someone who is hiding behind another and trying to bash another. Also, someone who is getting ganged could try to do something to put the offender into that position, such as a crushing blow.
Just something to toss around...I'm not sure I worded it very well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
vargal | Mon 03-Jan-05 02:13 PM |
Member since 07th Apr 2004
384 posts
| |
|
#6783, "RE: A combat change."
In response to Reply #0
|
I take it your not playing a bashing class at the moment...
Anyhow, a missed bash can spell disaster for a warrior as it is. Three rounds of lag without doing anything to your opponent is usually enough to make you quite dead between 15 and 30. After that, it is enough to tip the scales from a winning to a losing battle for the basher.
I can think of a million things that I'd do to someone if they missed a bash, got a bad flurry, ect.. Most things that fail give less lag to a warrior when they fail (trip, pincer, pummel, blah, blah), where bash is one of the few that gives more. I'd say that is a big enough draw back to its reliability without making a missed bash a deathsentance at 30+.
|
|
|
|
|   |
|
Mekantos | Mon 03-Jan-05 02:56 PM |
Member since 06th Dec 2003
796 posts
| |
|
#6785, "You read it wrong."
In response to Reply #1
|
I am saying that this would only affect people who are not tanking, and are therefore at little risk compared to the guy standing in front.
|
|
|
|
|