You are viewing a read-only archive of the Carrion Fields discussion forums built from a snapshot of the forum database on 2026-08-25. The search page works, though it is not as sophisticated as the old forum search. This archive encompasses approximately 25 years of CF discussion. Today, that discussion continues on Discord (see the main website for a link).

Some of the special-purpose forums are listed below along with their replacements (as of writing):


Subject: "Haggle vs. purchase price" Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #5341
Show all folders

TheerklaSat 31-Jul-04 07:06 AM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
1055 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#5341, "Haggle vs. purchase price"


          

Correct me if I'm wrong, but haggle is checked after you buy an item. What this means is that if you have 3,000 copper you cannot afford to buy something that costs 3,500 copper. Even though in the end, you may have ended up haggling the price down to well below the 3,000 copper you have.

  

Top

QaledusSat 31-Jul-04 11:30 AM
Member since 09th May 2004
458 posts
Click to add this author to your buddy list
#5342, "RE: Haggle vs. purchase price"
In response to Reply #0


          

>Correct me if I'm wrong, but haggle is checked after you buy
>an item. What this means is that if you have 3,000 copper
>you cannot afford to buy something that costs 3,500 copper.
>Even though in the end, you may have ended up haggling the
>price down to well below the 3,000 copper you have.

Sounds about right. From an in-character perspective you
could see it as the merchant wanting to see the money before
even talking to you and your persuasive abilities coming into
play. OOC, we don't want people spamming buy object until
haggle's random number generator says it's ok.

  

Top

Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #5341 Previous topic | Next topic