You are viewing a read-only archive of the Carrion Fields discussion forums built from a snapshot of the forum database on 2026-08-25. The search page works, though it is not as sophisticated as the old forum search. This archive encompasses approximately 25 years of CF discussion. Today, that discussion continues on Discord (see the main website for a link).

Some of the special-purpose forums are listed below along with their replacements (as of writing):


Subject: "Do Air Forms have inherent negative damage reduction?" Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #36496
Show all folders

HomardWed 24-Nov-10 02:41 PM
Member since 10th Apr 2010
959 posts 		Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#36496, "Do Air Forms have inherent negative damage reduction?"


          

A post on the other board started a discussion of Air Forms and how much damage they take. It has been suggested that air forms have negative damage reduction up to 25%.

Is there any truth to this?

Also, I'm soliciting better a better term than "negative damage reduction."

Thanks.

  
Top

ZulghinlourWed 24-Nov-10 03:06 PM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
9792 posts 		Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#36498, "They used to"
In response to Reply #0

          

It was something I made go away in the revamp (September 2008).

So long, and thanks for all the fish!

  
Top

    
HomardWed 24-Nov-10 06:28 PM
Member since 10th Apr 2010
959 posts 		Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#36504, "Thanks for the quick response. n/t"
In response to Reply #1

          

n/t

  
Top

Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #36496 Previous topic | Next topic