You are viewing a read-only archive of the Carrion Fields discussion forums built from a snapshot of the forum database on 2026-08-25. The search page works, though it is not as sophisticated as the old forum search. This archive encompasses approximately 25 years of CF discussion. Today, that discussion continues on Discord (see the main website for a link).

Some of the special-purpose forums are listed below along with their replacements (as of writing):


Subject: "IMM stance on Perma's." Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #28268
Show all folders

wareagleThu 06-Aug-09 11:37 AM
Member since 19th Aug 2007
209 posts 		Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#28268, "IMM stance on Perma's."


          

Since it has become such an open topic, I started wondering what the IMM stance is on it.

I think a lot of stragglers/people who were taught it was wrong when they started playing are being left behind by cliques. It's difficult to go at the game alone PK/RP/etc. if there -are- groups of people playing this game enhancing their PK/RP/cabal positions.

Second paragraph of mine really needs cleaning up, but thought I'd just fire this out as quick as I can since the subject is pretty self-explanatory. Not to mention, me talking about it a bit more might bring out names of alleged perma's, and I'd rather not pull that trigger.

  
Top

laxmanThu 06-Aug-09 02:17 PM
Member since 18th Aug 2003
1867 posts 		Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to send message via AOL IM
#28269, "in empire its called role play not perma"
In response to Reply #0

          

seriously how the same couple of guys that have always played together are still getting away with well the same thing.

  
Top

Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #28268 Previous topic | Next topic