|
|
RandomThinker | Wed 23-Sep-09 09:41 AM |
Member since 25th Jul 2005
30 posts
| |
|
#27880, "Removing observation exp/preventing a char from getting more?"
|
As you might have seen over on the other forums, there's a claim going on that an imm stripped a char of observation exp and prevented that char from getting more. I have trouble believing that this actually happened, or if it did, there must have been a DAMN good reason.
Shed some light?
|
|
|
|
 There was no immortal intervention,
Zulghinlour,
23-Sep-09 10:37 AM, #1
 RE: There was no immortal intervention,
Isildur,
23-Sep-09 11:10 AM, #2
 Nope. (n/t),
Twist ,
23-Sep-09 11:36 AM, #3
 Can you elaborate? n/t,
Lightmage,
23-Sep-09 05:30 PM, #4
 Most likely he was a transmuter in duo, and a Re-tard n...,
N b M,
23-Sep-09 05:38 PM, #5
 Probably was scripting,
Torak,
23-Sep-09 05:39 PM, #6
| |
|
|
Zulghinlour | Wed 23-Sep-09 10:37 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
9792 posts
| |
|
#27881, "There was no immortal intervention"
In response to Reply #0
|
And there is a damn good reason So long, and thanks for all the fish!
|
|
|
|
|     |
Twist | Wed 23-Sep-09 11:36 AM |
Member since 23rd Sep 2006
3431 posts
| |
|
#27883, "Nope. (n/t)"
In response to Reply #2
|
|
|
|       |
|
Lightmage | Wed 23-Sep-09 05:30 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
319 posts
| |
|
#27884, "Can you elaborate? n/t"
In response to Reply #3
|
n/t Hope is the worst of evils, for it prolongs the torment of man.
|
|
|
|
|         |
|
N b M | Wed 23-Sep-09 05:38 PM |
Member since 29th Sep 2005
444 posts
| |
|
#27885, "Most likely he was a transmuter in duo, and a Re-tard n..."
In response to Reply #4
|
|
|
|           |
|
Torak | Wed 23-Sep-09 05:39 PM |
Member since 15th Feb 2007
1220 posts
| |
|
#27886, "Probably was scripting"
In response to Reply #5
|
Like using CMUD/ZMUD to look at every noun in a room description.
|
|
|
|
|