|
|
Shapa | Sun 02-Nov-08 02:00 PM |
Member since 22nd Jun 2006
252 posts
|   |
|
#22787, "Removing (greatly lowering) the chances for dagger specs to avoid bashes via concelaed."
|
Perhaps i don't understand how exactly dagger specs avoid almost all bashes, but we all know it's true.
Perhaps it was nice ability for dagger specs when they sucked. But right now i vote for removing (greatly lowering) the chances for dagger specs to avoid bashes via concelaed.
Yes, i find it fair to bash dagger specs so they have to prep for it to use their maladactions. Afterall it's not too hard to change your size for next battle and many classes have to do it, why shouldn't dagger specs?
Discuss.
|
|
|
|
  My suggestion is to reduce dodge while being bashed dow...,
aspi,
03-Nov-08 02:30 AM, #8
It... really doesn't do that much. Honest. (n/t),
Daevryn,
02-Nov-08 04:10 PM, #2
 I always just thought it had a chance to fire on an alr...,
Lhydia,
02-Nov-08 06:19 PM, #3
 Look at the order in logs sometime, the concealed comes...,
Scrimbul,
02-Nov-08 11:34 PM, #6
How about?,
Kadsuane,
02-Nov-08 09:59 PM, #4
GET HEAVY WEAPONS. HIT NO MATTER WHAT WEAPONTYPE. NT,
Scrimbul,
02-Nov-08 11:35 PM, #7
I thought that had already been done,
Theerkla,
03-Nov-08 06:10 AM, #9
My recent personal experience vs. Twist says differentl...,
Scrimbul,
02-Nov-08 11:32 PM, #5
I would say I was 2/40 in bashes with a fire giant axe ...,
Gryshilniar,
08-Nov-08 02:29 PM, #10
I just made that up, but I don't think I ever landed mo...,
Gryshilniar,
08-Nov-08 02:30 PM, #11
Does concealed even really do that? n/t,
Lhydia,
02-Nov-08 02:22 PM, #1
| |
|
|
aspi | Mon 03-Nov-08 02:30 AM |
Member since 03rd Jul 2006
11 posts
|   |
|
#22795, "My suggestion is to reduce dodge while being bashed dow..."
In response to Reply #0
|
You're on the ground and out of balance to dodge well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daevryn | Sun 02-Nov-08 04:10 PM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
| |
|
#22789, "It... really doesn't do that much. Honest. (n/t)"
In response to Reply #0
|
|
|
| |
|
Lhydia | Sun 02-Nov-08 06:19 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
2435 posts
| |
|
#22790, "I always just thought it had a chance to fire on an alr..."
In response to Reply #2
|
|
|
| |
|
Kadsuane | Sun 02-Nov-08 09:59 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
169 posts
| |
|
#22791, "How about?"
In response to Reply #2
|
Changing parry to account for weapon size and weight. The "realism" changes to dodge heavily favored high dex races. It would also add depth into the melee weapon selection and reduce the one trick pony effect in game. Well thats my opinion anyway.
Parv
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Scrimbul | Sun 02-Nov-08 11:35 PM |
Member since 22nd Apr 2003
884 posts
|  |
|
#22794, "GET HEAVY WEAPONS. HIT NO MATTER WHAT WEAPONTYPE. NT"
In response to Reply #4
|
|
|
| |
|
Theerkla | Mon 03-Nov-08 06:10 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
1055 posts
| |
|
#22796, "I thought that had already been done"
In response to Reply #4
|
But even if it hasn't, one problem is, the less a dagger spec parries, the more they dodge, and hence the more concealed fires.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Gryshilniar | Sat 08-Nov-08 02:29 PM |
Member since 31st Jan 2006
85 posts
| |
|
#22829, "I would say I was 2/40 in bashes with a fire giant axe ..."
In response to Reply #2
|
|
|
| |
|
Gryshilniar | Sat 08-Nov-08 02:30 PM |
Member since 31st Jan 2006
85 posts
| |
|
#22830, "I just made that up, but I don't think I ever landed mo..."
In response to Reply #10
|
|
|
|
|
Lhydia | Sun 02-Nov-08 02:22 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
2435 posts
| |
|
#22788, "Does concealed even really do that? n/t"
In response to Reply #0
|
|
|
|
Printer-friendly copy 
Email this topic to a friend 
