You are viewing a read-only archive of the Carrion Fields discussion forums built from a snapshot of the forum database on 2026-08-25. The search page works, though it is not as sophisticated as the old forum search. This archive encompasses approximately 25 years of CF discussion. Today, that discussion continues on Discord (see the main website for a link).

Some of the special-purpose forums are listed below along with their replacements (as of writing):


Subject: "Berserk... what about Concentrate?" Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #19884
Show all folders

KashaSat 08-Dec-07 01:23 AM
Member since 06th Dec 2007
2 posts 		Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#19884, "Berserk... what about Concentrate?"


          

Probably all of us know of the skill of going BERSERK. A skill that increases one's hit and damage rolls, but decreases skill's effectiveness.

Is there a skill that does the complete opposite? Dreasing hit and damage rolls, but increases your skills? If not I think it would be a fantastic idea to have one. Perhaps, with its opposite nature to Berserk, called Concentrate?

  
Top

ZephonSun 09-Dec-07 12:01 PM
Member since 21st Mar 2007
488 posts 		Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list
#19893, "RE: Berserk... what about Concentrate?"
In response to Reply #0

          

Truthfully this idea would be nice.
A warrior would be more likely to strike his opponent if he is concentrating. I think it would be better for races with higher int and wis than strengh.
It would be more likely that it would Increase your hit roll rather than decrease it.

It also sounds like something that would be good to make mages not fail spells as much. I doubt they will add this idea.

  
Top

Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #19884 Previous topic | Next topic