|
|
Daevryn | Thu 18-Jan-07 01:24 AM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
|     |
|
#16025, "In the spirit of Christmas: Assassinate"
|
I guess it's closer to Martin Luther King day. Anyway.
As a reflection of varied approaches that might be taken with a weaponless assassination, an open-handed assassinate is generally straight up, ignoring both resistances and vulnerabilities (but not immunities).
Also, spotting your would-be assassin before the moment of truth is greatly detrimental to the success rate of the assassination, but, like wearing -60 save vs. spell underwear on power word kill day, not completely guaranteed to save your life.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Daevryn | Thu 18-Jan-07 01:38 PM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
| |
|
#16050, "RE: In the spirit of Christmas: Assassinate"
In response to Reply #1
|
>Are these changes, or are you just giving us some insight
>into the way it's always been?
Always.
>When you say bare-handed assassinate ignores resistances and
>vulnerabilities, does that include a giant's resist_physical
>and a gnome's vuln_blunt?
Yes.
>When you say "spotting your would-be assassin" does that
>include all types of "spotting"? Where? Who? Look? Scan?
>The paladin commune that shows you everybody in the room?
Who's straight out. I think everything else is kosher.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Tac | Thu 18-Jan-07 02:09 PM |
Member since 15th Nov 2005
2051 posts
| |
|
#16054, "Who resets stalks, and everything else lowers chances n..."
In response to Reply #3
|
|
|
| |
|
Daevryn | Thu 18-Jan-07 02:24 PM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
| |
|
#16056, "RE: In the spirit of Christmas: Assassinate"
In response to Reply #3
|
This one:
>That who doesn't count as "spotting" but everything else
>does?
|
|
|
|
|
Printer-friendly copy 
Email this topic to a friend 
