 RE: (DELETED) [None] Phyligis the Warrior of the Gauntl...,
Daevryn,
22-Apr-07 09:49 AM, #5
  Can we do away with custome warcrys?,
Pro-man (Guest),
22-Apr-07 10:33 AM, #6
   I don't agree with this as a solution.,
Vladamir,
22-Apr-07 10:47 AM, #7
  FYI...,
Vladamir,
22-Apr-07 10:48 AM, #8
  RE: I don't agree with this as a solution.,
Zulghinlour,
22-Apr-07 11:57 AM, #10
   I will say however...,
Vladamir,
22-Apr-07 12:33 PM, #11
  RE: I will say however...,
Zulghinlour,
22-Apr-07 05:11 PM, #17
  See? I think thats just fantastic.,
Vladamir,
22-Apr-07 09:28 PM, #19
  Santa Zulg abides,
Zulghinlour,
22-Apr-07 09:34 PM, #20
  Yeah, HE gets what HE wants. Pssh. nt,
Yhorian (Guest),
24-Apr-07 12:50 PM, #24
  I think the concept is skewed.,
Pro-Man (Guest),
22-Apr-07 01:09 PM, #12
  Also:,
Valguarnera ,
22-Apr-07 01:45 PM, #15
  RE: (DELETED) [None] Phyligis the Warrior of the Gauntl...,
Valguarnera ,
22-Apr-07 01:17 PM, #14
 RE: (DELETED) [None] Phyligis the Warrior of the Gauntl...,
Isildur,
22-Apr-07 03:23 PM, #16
 RE: (DELETED) [None] Phyligis the Warrior of the Gauntl...,
Phyligis (Guest),
21-Apr-07 01:11 PM, #1
 Damn it.,,
Roa (Guest),
21-Apr-07 02:33 PM, #2
 Gladly!,
Sebeok ,
22-Apr-07 01:30 AM, #3
  It's comments like these that really do not exemplify t...,
Rogue,
22-Apr-07 02:32 AM, #4
  Way to take the high road...NOT!,
lurker,
22-Apr-07 07:05 PM, #18
 Some classics should never be allowed to die.,
Vladamir,
22-Apr-07 11:39 AM, #9
 ####, that was even fun to listen too! ROTFL!,
Pro-man (Guest),
22-Apr-07 01:16 PM, #13
 They don't dislike either of us enough to put it to mus...,
Vladamir,
22-Apr-07 09:46 PM, #21
 :) n/t,
Balrahd. (Guest),
22-Apr-07 09:49 PM, #22
 Apparently I had a whole fecal theme going last night. ...,
Vladamir,
23-Apr-07 07:16 AM, #23
  Or maybe you just had constipation. nt,
DurNominator,
25-Apr-07 10:32 AM, #25
 I can, too! (ok this is low),
Marcus_,
25-Apr-07 11:10 AM, #26
| |
|
|
Daevryn | Sun 22-Apr-07 09:49 AM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
| |
|
#57550, "RE: (DELETED) [None] Phyligis the Warrior of the Gauntl..."
In response to Reply #0
|
Our fundamental and, apparently, several years recurring disconnect seems to be that you believe that doing a quest entitles you to the rewards of having done that quest forever, whereas I don't. The purpose of that quest was never for a character with an average warcry to have it rated as "My warcry is as cool as Tjok's" forever. I'll probably end up doing something or other to that quest (not removing it) in the near future to avoid fueling this kind of sense of entitlement in the future.
I had a little bit of time blocked off yesterday to try to finish up the next set of edges, and I ended up spending it reading, investigating, and responding to angry warcry notes instead. That's not really fair to any of the players that don't demand that kind of attention, and with that in mind, in the future I'm going to try to either ignore this kind of thing outright or drop the hammer faster.
|
|
|
|
|   | |
|
#57551, "Can we do away with custome warcrys?"
In response to Reply #5
|
They, mine included, make me cringe.
|
|
|
|
|       |
|
Zulghinlour | Sun 22-Apr-07 11:57 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
9792 posts
| |
|
#57556, "RE: I don't agree with this as a solution."
In response to Reply #7
|
>Warcries, by and large, are not a problem. Why should >everyone lose the ability to have custom warcries, because of >a small handfull of people who can't use it properly?
It's one more stupid thing immortals have to patrol. Honestly...I'd rather have that time spent checking descriptions and rewarding people who write roles than deal with the percentage of people who make customisable warcry stupid.
So long, and thanks for all the fish!
|
|
|
|
|           |
|
Zulghinlour | Sun 22-Apr-07 05:11 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
9792 posts
| |
|
#57567, "RE: I will say however..."
In response to Reply #11
|
>I think a gentle "Hey could you make your warcry something >more inspirational/appropriate" from a staffer would go a lot >further than just fiddling with #### and not saying anything.
Echoes have been added for when a warcry is modified. So long, and thanks for all the fish!
|
|
|
|
|             | |
|               |
|
Zulghinlour | Sun 22-Apr-07 09:34 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
9792 posts
| |
|
#57578, "Santa Zulg abides"
In response to Reply #19
|
>Kudos to you (or whoever did it) and thank you for listening to feedback from players.
It was me...and you're welcome. So long, and thanks for all the fish!
|
|
|
|
|                 | |
|
#57651, "Yeah, HE gets what HE wants. Pssh. nt"
In response to Reply #20
|
|
|
|       | |
|
#57559, "I think the concept is skewed."
In response to Reply #7
|
If it's supposed to pump you the screamer up, then what you want to scream is what you want to scream.
I #### you not. Once when assaulting across an objective I was doing the daffy duck laugh.
Hrm.... Come to think of it... I got my balls busted over that one....
Any way. I'd like a generic line. We've suffered long enough.
Maybe make them requestable like last names.
|
|
|
|
|       |
Valguarnera | Sun 22-Apr-07 01:45 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
6904 posts
| |
|
#57563, "Also:"
In response to Reply #7
|
Right now, there are 25 characters with reduced warcries, 73 characters with improved warcries, and a big pile with normal warcries.
So, like experience points or other roleplay incentives, it's used much more often for reward than punishment. (Not that this character was punished-- the warcry at the default strength.)
As with so many of these cases (uninductions, unempowerment, XP loss for poor RP, etc.), had the character handled it IC (changing the warcry) instead of OOC (bitchy notes to immortal), it likely would have gone better for him.
valguarnera@carrionfields.com
|
|
|
|
| |
|
#57538, "RE: (DELETED) [None] Phyligis the Warrior of the Gauntl..."
In response to Reply #0
|
I am owed a free pbf. Publish this one.
|
|
|
|
|   | |
|
#57539, "Damn it.,"
In response to Reply #1
|
I wanted payback and I nearly got it!
|
|
|
|
|     |
|
lurker | Sun 22-Apr-07 07:05 PM |
Member since 13th Mar 2006
249 posts
| |
|
#57572, "Way to take the high road...NOT!"
In response to Reply #3
|
Check yo self before you wreck yo self
|
|
|
|
|   |
|
Vladamir | Sun 22-Apr-07 11:39 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
1179 posts
|  |
|
#57554, "Some classics should never be allowed to die."
In response to Reply #1
|
|
|
|     | |
|
#57560, "####, that was even fun to listen too! ROTFL!"
In response to Reply #9
|
Bad ass.
I want a song now.
|
|
|
|
|       |
|
Vladamir | Sun 22-Apr-07 09:46 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
1179 posts
|  |
|
#57580, "They don't dislike either of us enough to put it to mus..."
In response to Reply #13
|
Apparently me being abrasive and hanging onto a grudge forever and a day and your (percieved though I don't see it) racism and trigger-whore accusations aren't enough to merit a song. Maybe a limerick or something at some point.
There once was a player named Pro, Who at the mention of triggers would grow, Very irate, like apes in a cage, Who at school children their poo they do throw.
Yeah, I'm tired. But thats as good a limerick as I can do on short notice with no sleep. I'll have something better tomorrow.
There once was a player named Vlad, Who hated that punk Balrahd. The staff would say poo, and Bally would coo, And ask them what color, egad.
|
|
|
|
|         | |
|
#57581, ":) n/t"
In response to Reply #21
|
>There once was a player named Vlad, >Who hated that punk Balrahd. >The staff would say poo, and Bally would coo, >And ask them what color, egad. >
|
|
|
|
|         |
|
Vladamir | Mon 23-Apr-07 07:16 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
1179 posts
|  |
|
#57597, "Apparently I had a whole fecal theme going last night. ..."
In response to Reply #21
|
|
|
|           |
|
DurNominator | Wed 25-Apr-07 10:32 AM |
Member since 08th Nov 2004
2018 posts
| |
|
#57687, "Or maybe you just had constipation. nt"
In response to Reply #23
|
|
|
|