 RE: (DELETED) [None] Annette the Grand Mistress of Chan...,
Annette (Guest),
20-Aug-03 10:55 AM, #2
  wouldn't the locating issue be,
incognito,
20-Aug-03 11:20 AM, #4
 It surely isn't....,
Annette (Guest),
21-Aug-03 12:23 AM, #5
 RE: (DELETED) [None] Annette the Grand Mistress of Chan...,
Quislet,
20-Aug-03 02:09 AM, #1
 RE: (DELETED) [None] Annette the Grand Mistress of Chan...,
Annette (Guest),
20-Aug-03 10:58 AM, #3
 RE: (DELETED) [None] Annette the Grand Mistress of Chan...,
Quislet,
21-Aug-03 01:22 AM, #6
 RE: (DELETED) [None] Annette the Grand Mistress of Chan...,
Annette (Guest),
22-Aug-03 12:29 PM, #7
| |
| |
|
#20601, "RE: (DELETED) [None] Annette the Grand Mistress of Chan..."
In response to Reply #0
|
Well, I guess it is time to retire this character. After an IMM telling me I was just logging in to locate stuff, I was an equipment "whore", etc. True, True. Most of the stuff was non limited, snow worm, pb rings, only things worth mentioning were: 2 x cold brooch, circlet of living seas. Circlet, any water form can get it easy. Go after the hoarding paladins why don' you. Not much when you're not in a cabal, a neutral character that's 90% of the time in form. Isn't that true for most neutral/neutral non- cabaled shifter? I decided to delete. I've been around when Dullameh was a whee necro. This shifter was just strictly for PK. I had the eagle/dolphin forms. I thought these two were pretty good. As an eagle, you cannot win against the golden eagle or vulture. Both dodge more than you can out damage them. As a dolphin, pulled even walrus, beat a manta ray and squid. Only one gripe, while in form, you can't say anything which limits any interaction with anyone. Sucks.
Most of my fights were against WARDERS and BATTLE:
WARDERS: Any gnome-based class caught on water was 99% dead. Dolphins simply tears them up. Against any other class/race, you've got a chance to run and quaff. I don't understand the half-drow hating. Tried to talk to Alysrith about it, got no where, so I ended killing any Warder that poppped out till it got changed..like it was gonna happen.
BATTLE: Only arial/felar sword/spear specializations stood a chance against the dolphin. A good flurry will send a stone-skin dolphin packing. Spin is really effective against a dolphin.
|
|
|
|
|   |
|
incognito | Wed 20-Aug-03 11:20 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
4495 posts
| |
|
#20604, "wouldn't the locating issue be"
In response to Reply #2
|
that if your guy is just locating stuff, he is doing it for the benefit of another of your characters who can't locate stuff? ie it is a form of multi-charring?
So it isn't so much whether that character could get it, but more whether your other characters would know whether it is available to be got?
|
|
|
|
|     | |
|
#20628, "It surely isn't...."
In response to Reply #4
|
Only have heroes for chars....<40, i don't care about eq, just power ranking. I never had to locate something for a lowbie chars. That's lame.
|
|
|
|
|   | |
|
#20602, "RE: (DELETED) [None] Annette the Grand Mistress of Chan..."
In response to Reply #1
|
I had another Annette, gnome porcupine. Back in the days when shifters only got 1 major form. with over 1300hp, you can kill almost anything in the game. Being aligned neutral means you don't have to worry about evil gangs, raid or warders (wall of thorns).
|
|
|
|
|       | |
|
#20650, "RE: (DELETED) [None] Annette the Grand Mistress of Chan..."
In response to Reply #6
|
with equipment? that's really bad. if you natural hp without training hp. that is really good. you can get basic eq for hp easy. let me see, roughly +250hp. and that's not even trying. that should get you to the 1000hp mark easy. i always have a (basic) set in mind at hero.
|
|
|
|
|