 I think this brings a lot of balance,
Vladamir,
24-Nov-04 10:57 AM, #6
 Nice nice.,
Bajula,
23-Nov-04 09:02 AM, #2
 RE: Changes to Word of Recall for some classes:,
WildGirl,
23-Nov-04 09:02 AM, #1
 Not sure I understand:,
Valguarnera ,
23-Nov-04 09:06 AM, #3
 RE: Not sure I understand:,
Tirach,
23-Nov-04 01:26 PM, #4
 Which gets back to the original point,
Theerkla,
23-Nov-04 02:13 PM, #5
 Maybe he meant saving himself, by wording his opponents...,
Cassman,
28-Nov-04 11:47 PM, #7
| |
|
|
WildGirl | Tue 23-Nov-04 02:03 AM |
Member since 16th Sep 2004
256 posts
| |
|
#487, "RE: Changes to Word of Recall for some classes:"
In response to Reply #0
|
Using Word of Recall was always a helpful weapon against people out of range from you. Was this also taken into consideration?
|
|
|
|
|     |
|
Tirach | Tue 23-Nov-04 11:05 AM |
Member since 26th Feb 2004
115 posts
|  |
|
#490, "RE: Not sure I understand:"
In response to Reply #3
|
Oh what is ment...
If you get ganged or raided I dont know how many times I have worderd a trusting opponant from the warlock tower in its days... Esp ragers 
Thing is, I have saved my butt a couple of times when getting ganged and c word target and the gang is 2/3 of what it was..
Very nice feature to have.
|
|
|
|
|       |
|
Theerkla | Tue 23-Nov-04 01:59 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
1055 posts
| |
|
#491, "Which gets back to the original point"
In response to Reply #4
|
Neither shamans no necromancers are supposed to be focused on saving others
|
|
|
|
|         |
|
Cassman | Sat 27-Nov-04 10:22 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
257 posts
|  |
|
#493, "Maybe he meant saving himself, by wording his opponents..."
In response to Reply #5
|
|
|
|