You are viewing a read-only archive of the Carrion Fields discussion forums built from a snapshot of the forum database on 2026-08-25. The search page works, though it is not as sophisticated as the old forum search. This archive encompasses approximately 25 years of CF discussion. Today, that discussion continues on Discord (see the main website for a link).

Some of the special-purpose forums are listed below along with their replacements (as of writing):


Subject: "Assasins and Thieves" Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top Ask An Immortal Amaranthe Topic #71
Show all folders

WPWed 30-Jun-04 08:24 PM
Member since 30th Jun 2004
7 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#71, "Assasins and Thieves"


          

I just read the FAQ and noticed you group assasins and thieves together, however, having played an outlander and reading the bark, I remember a mention of thieves but not assasins in classes to avoid. I realize both should be taken on a case by case basis, but should assasins be mentioned on the bark as well? Made sense to me that thieves were more anathema to the cause since certain paths and actions are tied more to civilization. Just curious.

WP

  

Top

AmarantheThu 01-Jul-04 11:11 AM
Member since 17th Mar 2003
536 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#72, "RE: Assasins and Thieves"
In response to Reply #0
Edited on Thu 01-Jul-04 11:13 AM

          

The bark mentions avoiding those of "the order of thieves" which is meant to imply those that are involve in thieves' guilds, along with the deep entrenchment of politics and currency that entails.

There is no opposition to the thief class in and of itself. One could even join the cabal, although obviously joining when you have chosen certain paths would be a dumb idea, both ideologically and practically speaking. (And any thief would find himself restricted to some extent.) Assassins could be in the same category as unguilded thieves of certain paths. When it comes to these two classes, I expect Outlanders to use their judgement when determining whether they are trustworthy companions. Obviously there's a big difference between a woodsy felar trapper who doesn't like the cities, and a slimey pickpocket who is obsessed with the aquisition of more gold.

  

Top

Top Ask An Immortal Amaranthe Topic #71 Previous topic | Next topic