Great question. Unfortunately, as I started to reply, I realized it’s going to be a bit lengthy, so I apologize if it covered way more than you actually asked.

One of the great things about Carrion Fields is its constant evolution. As such, I doubt if there’s a single player, mortal or immortal, who doesn’t have feelings about the sphere of Honor, and few of them would totally agree on what a “true” follower of Honor would espouse. (I only wish the same ardor would be showed about all of our spheres than just the one). We’ve gone through an evolution of Knights, the Ehren Guard, individuals such as Cador, Shokai, Balgrimnr as well as several other mortals who made their mark on this individual sphere. Many will indicate that there is an inherent “parity” issue on Honor, while others have viewed it more of a standard of conduct. The latter is my holding – Honor is a standard of conduct built upon integrity, respect and one’s reputation, as well as a blend of caste-like pride of what is tolerable to an individual’s personal name. So, in short, the matter of parity is of less value to me, and understanding of the greater sense of the word prevails. If a character wanted to take the parity route, I have the utmost respect for such a decision, but that in itself does not dictate an “honorable” character in my opinion.

The other aspect that I feel compelled to address is that the religion itself is one of three intermingled spheres – War, Rage and Honor. As such, those that are marked with a tattoo are expected to show all three – not just one single aspect. It’s one of the reasons I title those that petition for the tattoo with “Seekers of the Clarion”. I get great feedback on those characters by many folks with things they see right or wrong. It also lets the player know that yes, they’re going to be judged by many for that title, and some of the expectations/reactions from people even before being granted a tattoo, should they be found worthy of such.

So, in short, Vahletherian showed very good understanding and roleplay of the religion. I have no qualms with having marked him with it, nor with any of the tattooed followers I’ve had. I don’t expect perfection out of folks, but I do expected continued adherence and growth of their roleplay. I have not been unknown to strip someone of their tattoo if their roleplay is not in accordance, yet I’m also known to let someone learn from such and make amends.

Exactly the sort of answers I wanted! I've played a few Knights and Knight-like characters, and I've always more believed in the view you've given, rather than the more "honorable/parity-in-combat" view. I was primarily curious as to Zulghinlour's Immortal comments, as to whether it was his own comments on Vahletherian, and how he felt, or for your information to do something about it.

n/t

So long, and thanks for all the fish!