>heh damn so bored from idiots fools and morons, no
>offenc,just bored
>bored from imms, that begin SNNOOOOPP you, when you already
>going to
>quit,

Be rational. An imm snooping you lets them do nothing more than see what you are doing. If you are doing what you should be, it is a good thing, not a bad thing.

Is the imm meant to be psychic and know you are already going to quit?!

> what can I do if my playn time changes? delete
>delete,thank you.

uh, wtf are you on about? Changing playing times should not matter. Are you expecting the imms to change theirs too to suit you? As long as you still pull your weight, changing playing times will not be a problem. I've had characters join cabals and then suddenly have to cut their hours, but, provided you show yourself during bad times as well as good, you will have no problems.

>yes I understand that Empire - cabal with moronical rp,

I suggest you play it before you judge it. Personally, I haven't played empire, but I do know that when you've played scion, for example, you don't view it the same way as you do if you play only enemies of scion beforehand.

> as for>me,
>but How can marans go in the same way? dunno.. my cabalmates
>two times they show me so nice things.

Being good aligned doesn't mean you have to take people under your wing and spoon-feed them. That's like expecting your teachers (I'm guessing you are at school still) to tell you the answers to all exam questions. No matter what side you are on, you are expected to earn your rewards.

.Yes Heros very nice guys, cant say
>the same about low level chars..
>

Low level characters have different agendas to heros. Each character has an individual personality. I remember disliking someone because they were a total coward. Then when they deleted I realised their role was that they were a total coward, at which point I had nothing but respect for them.

>what can I do? trust all off.. and kill all tacktik?

Trust all off does not kill off all tactics. For starters, if you are fighting alone, it will not kill off ANY tactics at all.

Personally, I will usually keep norescue on, nogive on, trustall off etc. Does this mean I kill off all tactics? No. I will switch trustall on on the rare occasion when I expect to benefit from it. I will swtich nosummon off on the rare occasion I expect it to be useful. I will switch norescue off on the rare occasion that I trust my groupmates not to kill me by trying to rescue at bad times.

>or just delete delete and roll A-P?

Hate to break it to you, but ap is a difficult class to play. You really don't want to be playing an ap if you aren't happy with how things pan out in pk already.

> to scions? no dont like this

Uhh, perhaps you should play a scion before you judge them?

>Do you know any cabal where I can trust my clanmates?

Any cabal. Maybe you can't trust them all, but even in an evil cabal (like scion) you should be able to decide who you want to trust and who you don't. For example, my character had killed scions before he joined them, so I wouldn't have expected them to be trustworthy, but ultimately I found that most were. I had my enemies in scion, but I also had my friends. I had a reasonable (perhaps imperfect) idea of who was which.

>Yes silvans was very nice guys.. but only they any help? maybe you can tell me how I must play?
>

I would say that the fortress are generally far more reliable help-wise than sylvan. If you weren't getting help from the fortress it is likely:

1. You expect too much and piss them off. I'm a good guy in real life, but even I won't continually help someone who won't help themself.

2. You picked bad individuals to expect help from. They may have something in their role that says they are cowards, or traitors.

3. There was other stuff but I'm too drunk to remember it.

>
>

Yes, even as a Maran turn off trustall unless you have specific reason to use it.

There are morons in every cabal.

If you want better roleplaying interactions with your cabal, lead by example.



Hutto, the Sleepy Nitpicker

That was funny to read...

valguarnera@carrionfields.com

Wherein reference is made to the theory that given infinite time 1,000 monkeys randomly banging away on keyboards would come up with the complete works of Shakespeare.

This post? One monkey, five minutes.

heh. heh. That is my favorite of all your posts.