|
CD | Fri 07-Dec-12 12:54 PM |
Member since 05th Jul 2012
279 posts
| |
|
#49, "Shapeshifter consideration."
|
What I want is a power-up to water shifters and modification to airform. Everyone knows I love shapeshifters and that I love air forms.
I would like to see swim-to removed on lower water forms. Its not as big a game-changer as fly-to would be. And completely optional for opponents to walk on water. This could gotten through an edge or an enliven.
I think that nets that swing with echo on air forms should give a 0tick earthbind like affect. In the sense it remove the ability to fly up for the remainder of the tick. They still, fly, so cannot be trip spammed.
Those are my tweak ideas.
Though I will still throw that jab out to say that I think that major forms should get two second tier forms(around 48-49). To diversify and open up options for them in not such a big and drastic fashion. More utility in the sense.
|
|
|
|
|
Zulghinlour | Sat 08-Dec-12 03:52 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
9792 posts
| |
|
#62, "RE: Shapeshifter consideration."
In response to Reply #0
|
>What I want is a power-up to water shifters and modification >to airform. Everyone knows I love shapeshifters and that I >love air forms. > >I would like to see swim-to removed on lower water forms.
I'm lost, how is this a power-up to water shifters? I don't see any reason lower level water forms should lose swimto.
>I think that nets that swing with echo on air forms should >give a 0tick earthbind like affect. In the sense it remove the >ability to fly up for the remainder of the tick. They still, >fly, so cannot be trip spammed.
Meh
>Though I will still throw that jab out to say that I think >that major forms should get two second tier forms(around >48-49). To diversify and open up options for them in not such >a big and drastic fashion. More utility in the sense.
And I'll throw that jab in the circular file. So long, and thanks for all the fish!
|
|
|
|
  |
CD | Sun 09-Dec-12 12:11 AM |
Member since 05th Jul 2012
279 posts
| |
|
#67, "RE: Shapeshifter consideration."
In response to Reply #1
|
That's because I can't proofread.
It's suppose to say, Swim-to LAG.
Not removing swim-to.
|
|
|
|
    |
Zulghinlour | Sun 09-Dec-12 11:43 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
9792 posts
| |
|
#72, "Santa Zulg partially abides"
In response to Reply #2
|
>That's because I can't proofread. > >It's suppose to say, Swim-to LAG. > >Not removing swim-to.
I've reduced, but not removed the swimto lag for lower-level water forms. So long, and thanks for all the fish!
|
|
|
|
|