|
Calion | Mon 02-Jul-18 10:33 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
367 posts
| |
|
#71093, "Wrath tweak suggestion"
|
I think the problem with old 1 rnd wrath was mostly in the midranks, where it did too much damage too fast. Changing it to 2 rnds seems to have been too harsh especially for shield dedicants, which look rather bland and unpopular now. So I'd propose the following tweaks, which I think would make the skill better balanced for both the paladin (more useful/tactical) and her enemies (less damage potential): Wrath:
- 1 rnd lag when communed at L51 (i.e. we won't have any unempowered wrath monkeys running around, as they commune at -1 level) - If/when the victim gets the cursed 'wrath' affect, they get less damage from any subsequent wraths as "already suffering from the wrath of a god", say maybe ~66...75% of normal at L51, and with a smaller reduction below L51 (so that 2 rnd wrath doesn't become useless after the 'wrath' affect)
Possible additional options:
1. Also require the skill to be at 100% for 1 rnd lag 2. Maybe tweak the overall (normal) wrath damage down slightly 3. Or even make it 1 rnd at any level (at 100%), but also always apply the 'already wrathed' damage reduction fully (I'd likely include point 2 above, if this was done)
|
|
|
|
Wrath isn't the issue to me: Some thread hijack ...,
Itham,
04-Jul-18 02:42 AM, #9
You could...,
Relio,
03-Jul-18 04:28 PM, #7
RE: Wrath tweak suggestion,
robdarken_,
03-Jul-18 03:30 PM, #6
I think wrath is in a good place right now,
Drissa (Anonymous),
03-Jul-18 10:19 AM, #3
RE: I think wrath is in a good place right now,
Jhyrbian,
03-Jul-18 10:23 AM, #4
RE: I think wrath is in a good place right now,
Calion,
03-Jul-18 11:39 AM, #5
Out of curiosity, why do you post as your active char?,
Cointreau,
03-Jul-18 05:29 PM, #8
RE: Wrath tweak suggestion,
incognito,
03-Jul-18 08:01 AM, #2
I support this. Nt,
jalbrin,
02-Jul-18 06:11 PM, #1
| |
|
Relio | Tue 03-Jul-18 04:28 PM |
Member since 23rd Sep 2014
246 posts
| |
|
#71116, "You could..."
In response to Reply #0
|
Make that an edge.
So you could have full juice two round wrath, or you could take the edge for 1 round wrath with reduced damage after curse effect.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#71112, "I think wrath is in a good place right now"
In response to Reply #0
|
It still throws out crazy damage, still can be used to open, and curse/track the wicked are amazing side effects. It seems like a 2 round skill to me.
I don't think the changes you're describing are necessary, and I think that maybe they'd even return wrath to being overpowered, especially because it would make it BETTER than it currently is for paladins who are only using it to get the curse affect applied.
From what I saw with Borlan, shield paladins are very viable still, they're just super defensive... so yes, less popular in a meta that favors burst damage/kill sealing, but not underpowered.
|
|
|
|
  |
Jhyrbian | Tue 03-Jul-18 10:23 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
919 posts
| |
|
#71113, "RE: I think wrath is in a good place right now"
In response to Reply #3
|
Pick any 2 other virtues and they become a shade of deadly too I suspect. I think shield dedis are fine.
|
|
|
|
  |
Calion | Tue 03-Jul-18 11:39 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
367 posts
| |
|
#71114, "RE: I think wrath is in a good place right now"
In response to Reply #3
|
>I don't think the changes you're describing are necessary, and >I think that maybe they'd even return wrath to being >overpowered, especially because it would make it BETTER than >it currently is for paladins who are only using it to get the >curse affect applied.
Yes, it would make wrath better than it is now, but worse than old wrath, and in my mind the correct balance lies somewhere between those two extremes. Which with this could be achieved quite easily by just finding a suitable damage reduction for the already wrathed while also reducing its normal damage range somewhat.
|
|
|
|
|
incognito | Tue 03-Jul-18 08:01 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
4495 posts
| |
|
#71107, "RE: Wrath tweak suggestion"
In response to Reply #0
|
Restriction one doesn't mean much.
Other than that it's not bad.
Not sure how I'd code it but I'd make it so that you can't wrath someone who is being lagged by someone else for much damage.
|
|
|
|
|
jalbrin | Mon 02-Jul-18 06:11 PM |
Member since 20th Apr 2009
211 posts
| |
|
#71105, "I support this. Nt"
In response to Reply #0
|
|
|
|