|
|
Athioles | Sat 09-Jun-18 10:40 AM |
Member since 09th Jan 2011
392 posts
|     |
|
#70973, "Why ban people from hell?"
|
If you think the area is producing too much high end gear then revamp or close it.
If you think the people are "cheating" then deny them outright.
What good is it to just deny people access without so much as an explanation?
|
|
|
|
  RE: Why ban people from hell?,
incognito,
09-Jun-18 01:26 PM, #1
 Do you abuse mother wyvern?,
Kstatida,
09-Jun-18 04:34 PM, #2
 RE: Do you abuse mother wyvern?,
incognito,
09-Jun-18 05:12 PM, #3
Best not to feed the troll. Nt,
jalbrin,
10-Jun-18 01:16 PM, #4
You mistake me for someone else,
Kstatida,
13-Jun-18 03:30 AM, #7
sorry,
ExExplorer,
10-Jun-18 01:43 PM, #5
RE: Why ban people from hell?,
Saagkri,
10-Jun-18 02:21 PM, #6
| |
|
|
incognito | Sat 09-Jun-18 01:26 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
4495 posts
| |
|
#70974, "RE: Why ban people from hell?"
In response to Reply #0
|
This seems like a silly question.
Explain why it wouldn't make sense to ban people from an area they are abusing, and retain them as players, rather then life them as players when there's a solution that gives a warning.
I suspect next time evidence is provided they incriminates them a full ban (of some duration) could result.
Also why would you always choose to reveal sources?
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Kstatida | Sat 09-Jun-18 04:34 PM |
Member since 12th Feb 2015
2214 posts
| |
|
#70975, "Do you abuse mother wyvern?"
In response to Reply #1
|
WTF is "abuse"? If something can be abused, it only implies bad design.
Like were you abusing lizard tail scrolls?
|
|
|
|
| |
|
incognito | Sat 09-Jun-18 05:12 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
4495 posts
| |
|
#70976, "RE: Do you abuse mother wyvern?"
In response to Reply #2
|
You really are ignorant.
Half the time you think I was using Scrolls I wasn't. Your crap about how I deleted when they ran out was ####. They ran out long before I deleted and when I deleted there were no threats to me that bashed.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
jalbrin | Sun 10-Jun-18 01:16 PM |
Member since 20th Apr 2009
211 posts
| |
|
#70983, "Best not to feed the troll. Nt"
In response to Reply #3
|
|
|
| |
|
Kstatida | Wed 13-Jun-18 03:30 AM |
Member since 12th Feb 2015
2214 posts
| |
|
#71008, "You mistake me for someone else"
In response to Reply #3
|
|
|
| |
|
ExExplorer | Sun 10-Jun-18 01:43 PM |
Member since 02nd Jun 2018
11 posts
| |
|
#70984, "sorry"
In response to Reply #1
|
but it's a silly way to retain players
are you going to spend 500 hours for game with shady/immchanging rules ?
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Saagkri | Sun 10-Jun-18 02:21 PM |
Member since 17th Jun 2014
801 posts
| |
|
#70985, "RE: Why ban people from hell?"
In response to Reply #1
|
I think there's some confusion about "an area which they are abusing". I don't know what this means.
I think there is a case to be made for transparency when it comes to punishments like this. For the punishment to serve as a deterrence to others, then others have to know what precipitated it so they can avoid "abusing the area". Also, without transparency, people will assume what happened. The assumption may or may not make the IMMs look like arbitrary jerks. The IMMs need to be trusted and need to appear to be fair. That's important for a game.
If there's some reason that the offense in this case should not be made public, then the IMMs can state the reason and it would be better than silence.
|
|
|
|
|
