Subject: "Conjie Familiars...." Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #35245
Show all folders

WelverinMon 13-Sep-10 02:48 PM
Member since 23rd Oct 2009
624 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#35245, "Conjie Familiars...."


          

Are they really Random? Or is there some pattern to get a different one. I've had Coyote with three goodie conjurers now. Other than that Djinn on one, Faerie Dragon on one, and Cherub on one. Any rhyme or reason as to why the Coyote seems to skew more than the other three? Or just dumb luck?

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Reply RE: Conjie Familiars...., Daevryn, 13-Sep-10 05:57 PM, #3
Reply RE: Conjie Familiars...., Isildur, 13-Sep-10 06:46 PM, #4
Reply They used to be based on your name., ibuki, 13-Sep-10 04:16 PM, #1
     Reply RE: They used to be based on your name., Welverin, 13-Sep-10 04:42 PM, #2
          Reply 2-4hrs for me so don't worry you will get better and it..., ConjurerBob (Anonymous), 14-Sep-10 02:36 AM, #5
          Reply No offense, but you had only 5-6 conjurers..., sleepy, 14-Sep-10 03:30 AM, #6
               Reply No offense taken, Welverin, 14-Sep-10 08:27 AM, #7
                    Reply if you utilize a t distribution you can account for err..., laxman, 14-Sep-10 05:41 PM, #8

DaevrynMon 13-Sep-10 05:57 PM
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#35248, "RE: Conjie Familiars...."
In response to Reply #0


          

>Are they really Random?

Yes.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
IsildurMon 13-Sep-10 06:46 PM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
5969 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#35249, "RE: Conjie Familiars...."
In response to Reply #3


          

Close enough for govt. work.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

ibukiMon 13-Sep-10 04:16 PM
Member since 30th Oct 2005
122 posts
Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#35246, "They used to be based on your name."
In response to Reply #0


          

It was something like, a=1, b=2, c=3, d=1, e=2, and so on, for the whole alphabet. You would add the numbers the letters of your name match, then mod 3, and you ended up with a number from 1-3 that decided your familiar. I liked it like this, since it let you decide what familiar you wanted if you took the time. Now it's just random though, so you have to delete and recreate if you don't like the one you got. The outcome is exactly the same, in that a determined player will get the familiar they want, it's just a lot more tedious.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
WelverinMon 13-Sep-10 04:42 PM
Member since 23rd Oct 2009
624 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#35247, "RE: They used to be based on your name."
In response to Reply #1


          

Not much of a sample size but skewing 50% on one type of familiar just seemed a bit odd to me. Not going to complain a whole lot, cause it's not one that I would say is totally useless, but it would have been nice to get something else on some of them. Doing a character right to level 17 for me is a 4-7 hour investment, so throw away is not something I was really looking forward to.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
ConjurerBob (Anonymous)Tue 14-Sep-10 02:36 AM
Charter member
#35253, "2-4hrs for me so don't worry you will get better and it..."
In response to Reply #2


          

~

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
sleepyTue 14-Sep-10 03:30 AM
Member since 24th Jul 2007
223 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#35254, "No offense, but you had only 5-6 conjurers..."
In response to Reply #2


          

You should probably take a stats class.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
WelverinTue 14-Sep-10 08:27 AM
Member since 23rd Oct 2009
624 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#35256, "No offense taken"
In response to Reply #6


          

And i took a sadsitics course, hated every minute of it. hense the comment on the sample size being rather small.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
laxmanTue 14-Sep-10 05:41 PM
Member since 18th Aug 2003
1867 posts
Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to send message via AOL IM
#35262, "if you utilize a t distribution you can account for err..."
In response to Reply #7


          

and as a result you can formulate confidence intervals with small sample sizes. Of course those will have a much wider range of possible outcomes that are statistically plausible then ones formulated with larger sample sizes.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #35245 Previous topic | Next topic