|
Lund | Sun 24-Dec-06 11:28 AM |
Member since 15th Dec 2006
21 posts
| |
|
#1589, "Areas command"
|
I seem to be doing something wrong. I type things like the following:
areas 1 5
areas 5 10
areas
And I get the same answer no matter what - the entire list of areas.
How do I get a smaller list, specific to newbies?
|
|
|
|
RE: Areas command,
Rayihn,
24-Dec-06 09:59 PM, #2
He, like me, may have thought,
(NOT Pro),
25-Dec-06 02:47 AM, #3
RE: He, like me, may have thought,
Lund,
25-Dec-06 05:34 AM, #4
RE: He, like me, may have thought,
Kastellyn,
25-Dec-06 09:38 PM, #5
RE: He, like me, may have thought,
Lund,
26-Dec-06 03:38 AM, #6
RE: He, like me, may have thought,
Sandello,
04-Jan-07 06:47 PM, #7
RE: Areas command,
TheFrog,
24-Dec-06 01:03 PM, #1
| |
  |
|
#1592, "He, like me, may have thought"
In response to Reply #2
|
It would show you areas that fell within those parameters, not areas that included them.
|
|
|
|
    |
Lund | Mon 25-Dec-06 05:31 AM |
Member since 15th Dec 2006
21 posts
| |
|
#1593, "RE: He, like me, may have thought"
In response to Reply #3
Edited on Mon 25-Dec-06 05:34 AM
|
>It would show you areas that fell within those parameters, >not areas that included them.
Yup. You hit the nail on the head. Otherwise, why include the higher parameter? If I say - areas 1 5 - and I get a list of areas good for 1 to 30 - what did the "5" accomplish? I understand what the lesser digit "1" accomplished and I see the value of showing more areas as opposed to less, I just don't understand the significance of the "5" in the syntax employed.
|
|
|
|
        |
Lund | Tue 26-Dec-06 03:38 AM |
Member since 15th Dec 2006
21 posts
| |
|
#1595, "RE: He, like me, may have thought"
In response to Reply #5
|
>Say there is an area that's good for levels 5 to 15; that area >will show up if you type in 'areas 1 5'. It won't show up if >you type in 'areas 1 4'. That's what your upper-limit >accomplished - it brought in the areas that have a lower >lower-limit.
OK. Thanks! So both parameters are employed to filter the lower bound. The upper bound remains unfiltered. Makes sense now. I appreciate the explanation.
|
|
|
|
          |
Sandello | Thu 04-Jan-07 06:47 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
175 posts
| |
|
#1602, "RE: He, like me, may have thought"
In response to Reply #6
|
Actually, no, it does filtering on the upper bound as well - it makes sure the upper bound is bigger than the smaller of the two parameters. So if you enter 'areas 20 30', the area that is good for levels 15-25, will make it into the list, but the area that is good for levels 5-15 won't.
It basically returns the areas whose level ranges intersect with the level range specified by the parameters you enter.
|
|
|
|
|