|
|
#89987, "Bahamuth has vanished during his adventures."
|
My second invoker hero, first was about 5-6 years ago (or even more). I went earth/frost paths with 10 affinity, and 3 3 3 3 3 were in other elements. After getting my most powerful spells I figured that it was a totally wrong choice, but it was too late to change anything. Funny, but despite 3 affinity in air path, my first shield was airshield.
Invokers are fun to play, but I had very little way of keeping foes from fleeing, except for quicksand, which can be is easily avoided by everyone, except for non-arial ragers. So, my invoker was kind of a support class - and I expected something else.
I've got bored with him at the end and though that after a month of holidays I will find new strategy and will be more effective, but seems it will not happen. I am not upset, though - 10/10 affinity in earth/air was burdening me everytime I've logged in
Another reason why my interest in CF waning - I've explored every single area except for ST and Hell. It's sad to see that no new areas are being builded; I remember time in POS, where I've been helping some dragon imm to create new area - it took something like two weeks to make a quite complicated, big area, and one more week to set mobs. Now, CF reminds me a deathmatch level from the quake3 game, where we know every turn, every hideout and can run blind from one continent to another in a minute. Probably this is why I am (and other players) are leaving for a year or two - so
I don't remember most of you anymore, except for:
Tinsalaop - the best, but I wrote in your tpoic;
Lamanee - same as Tinsalaop
Dzintiry - very nice, interesting character to fight, and knew how to make me run. If not you, I would eat most of the imperials alone. Good luck with your next!
Esteludu - we had interesting travels, no doubt. Liked your character.
Most likely I forgot someone because of the long time of absence. If so, I will be glad to hear from you!
Good luck to everyone, and see you later.
|
|
|
|
|
DurNominator | Sun 17-Jan-10 12:00 PM |
Member since 08th Nov 2004
2018 posts
| |
|
#89990, "Did you really have a Bahamuth in the fields."
In response to Reply #0
|
I shudder.
This was the first hit Google presented to me with keyword "Bahamuth" after asking "Did you mean Bahamut?".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bahamut
Other similar beast with probably same origins with the name, with the missing h in the end in place, but different vowels:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behemoth
Sorry I'm harping about this, but I just saw the connection immediately.
|
|
|
|
  |
|
#90003, "RE: Did you really have a Bahamuth in the fields."
In response to Reply #1
|
In short - yes Do you mind it? There is a Scarabaeus, why can't I be a Bahamuth?
|
|
|
|
    |
Splntrd | Sun 17-Jan-10 06:20 PM |
Member since 08th Feb 2004
1096 posts
| |
|
#90004, "Technically you can, but your logic is faulty"
In response to Reply #2
|
Scarabaeus was made a long long time ago, when naming standards were much more relaxed. You're correct in that your name would have fit in fine back then.
Nowadays it will stand out. Splntrd
|
|
|
|
      |
|
#90008, "RE: Technically you can, but your logic is faulty"
In response to Reply #3
|
But it did not, especially after something like Macaca or gnome Demetrius. So, I don't see it as a problem. There were worse names. For evil mage name was fine, especially since it was pointed in the roile, why he have such name.
|
|
|
|
        |
Splntrd | Sun 17-Jan-10 09:12 PM |
Member since 08th Feb 2004
1096 posts
| |
|
#90010, "RE: Technically you can, but your logic is faulty"
In response to Reply #4
|
Sure; there are worse names, and yours is certainly acceptable. I was just explaining why it might stand out especially to some people, and why citing "Scarabaeus" in your defense doesn't really apply.
It didn't really bother me. Splntrd
|
|
|
|
|