Why delete?,
Aereglen,
30-Nov-12 05:19 PM, #6
Hi there!,
Stunna,
28-Nov-12 09:10 AM, #1
Scion has changed in this regard for the worse.,
Minyar,
28-Nov-12 02:38 PM, #2
This is mostly correct,
Reksah,
29-Nov-12 02:43 PM, #3
RE: This is mostly correct,
Stunna,
29-Nov-12 08:27 PM, #4
RE: This is mostly correct,
Reksah,
29-Nov-12 09:28 PM, #5
| |
|
Aereglen | Fri 30-Nov-12 05:19 PM |
Member since 23rd Apr 2011
476 posts
| |
|
#112110, "Why delete?"
In response to Reply #0
|
Where you really that close to Drekvah that when he is gone you just throw in the towel? Gear comes and goes, I hope you didn't delete over losing some of your stuff.
|
|
|
|
    |
Reksah | Thu 29-Nov-12 02:26 PM |
Member since 30th Apr 2011
94 posts
| |
|
#112090, "This is mostly correct"
In response to Reply #2
Edited on Thu 29-Nov-12 02:43 PM
|
With a cabal with a general limit of 10 members, I want the characters in it to have a role more developed than being a meatshield for mages. The cabal is already vulnerable to OOC permas to the exclusion of deserving applicants. While this vulnerability isn't the reason I stressed the change, going back to the old way would encourage it.
Edited to add: I will say that my favorite leader in recent years was a ranger, Paraloiut, and that I have seen plenty of martial/rogue characters that were perfectly fine as Scions.
BTW, Morgrul, apologies on the uninduct/reinduct. I didn't receive the note due to the typo and don't have the ability to read a characters notes without some assistance.
|
|
|
|
        |
Reksah | Thu 29-Nov-12 09:28 PM |
Member since 30th Apr 2011
94 posts
| |
|
#112097, "RE: This is mostly correct"
In response to Reply #4
|
Nope!
I've thought about changing it. I'm still thinking about changing it.
|
|
|
|
|