|
#73945, "RE: Pretty sure it isn't me being obtuse"
|
You are making my point, really. And I do think you're being obtuse.
"If a mage is perma invis like you say, then they are not going to be in a situation where you can catch them even if you can see invis."
Why? What does that even mean.
Everything boils down to this: few or no mages at all, and when there is a mage, virtually always invisible. This gives battle applicant - the player - zero fun. And it can last forever.
The change means the battle applicant - the player - can choose to level up to 25 and get detect invisible. It won't change the scarcity of mages, but it will give just a bit better chance for the applicant - player - to be able to do what the requirement demands, hunt a mage. The mage still has all the advantages, but it's just a tiny bit less impossible. It's still up to the applicant player to get that kill, and it still may take forever, but at least it's not the near impossibility it is now with a total block ability, which invisibility is.
You keep making assumptions and not relying on the basic facts, which are facts. And I'm not doing this because of only my experience, though no, my last characters were not killed by mages. And no, mages at level 25 don't often come. But again, this is all irrelevant.
The change harms no one, it does not reduce mage play because as you seem to think, by level 25 they would come at you anyway, so they want to fight, and no applicant under 25, kill or no kill, gets detect invis.
Make the change.
|
|
|
Proposed Change To Battle Induction Process
[View all] , Battle Applicant (Anonymous), Sun 23-Feb-20 12:46 PM
You want to fix the mage problem? ,
Blkdrgn,
02-Feb-20 11:56 AM, #36
FWIW,
Bemused,
01-Feb-20 10:45 PM, #17
RE: FWIW,
Battle Applicant (Anonymous),
01-Feb-20 11:35 PM, #19
We are disagreeing that your facts are not facts.,
SPN,
02-Feb-20 09:07 AM, #30
RE: We are disagreeing that your facts are not facts.,
Battle Applicant (Anonymous),
02-Feb-20 11:32 AM, #32
RE: We are disagreeing that your facts are not facts.,
SPN,
02-Feb-20 02:54 PM, #38
Wtf...,
clnt2020,
02-Feb-20 02:10 AM, #21
RE: Wtf...,
Battle Applicant (Anonymous),
02-Feb-20 02:44 AM, #23
RE: Wtf...,
clnt2020,
02-Feb-20 06:33 AM, #28
RE: Wtf...,
Battle Applicant (Anonymous),
02-Feb-20 11:30 AM, #31
Just get in without a mage kill.,
lasentia,
03-Feb-20 09:21 AM, #40
This is pretty terrible advice.,
Java,
03-Feb-20 09:28 AM, #42
My sarcasm skills need work.,
lasentia,
03-Feb-20 01:58 PM, #43
RE: My sarcasm skills need work.,
Orbain,
23-Feb-20 04:21 AM, #44
I call B.S.,
SPN,
02-Feb-20 09:03 AM, #29
Get better at pk.,
SPN,
01-Feb-20 11:44 AM, #6
PS: I am by no means a great pker.,
SPN,
01-Feb-20 11:43 AM, #7
RE: Get better at pk.,
Battle Applicant (Anonymous),
01-Feb-20 04:24 PM, #9
Honestly, lack of detect invis shouldn't be a problem f...,
incognito,
01-Feb-20 05:35 PM, #11
RE: Honestly, lack of detect invis shouldn't be a probl...,
Battle Applicant (Anonymous),
01-Feb-20 05:49 PM, #12
So how does giving detect invite help then?,
incognito,
02-Feb-20 01:59 AM, #20
RE: So how does giving detect invite help then?,
Battle Applicant (Anonymous),
02-Feb-20 02:47 AM, #25
Pretty sure it isn't me being obtuse,
incognito,
02-Feb-20 04:39 AM, #26
RE: Pretty sure it isn't me being obtuse,
Battle Applicant (Anonymous),
02-Feb-20 11:39 AM #33
RE: Pretty sure it isn't me being obtuse,
incognito,
02-Feb-20 05:04 PM, #39
Nobody is misunderstanding you.,
robdarken_,
01-Feb-20 07:15 PM, #13
You have two problems here.,
Battle Applicant (Anonymous),
01-Feb-20 08:53 PM, #14
rank up n/t,
robdarken_,
02-Feb-20 02:46 AM, #24
RE: rank up n/t,
Battle Applicant (Anonymous),
02-Feb-20 11:40 AM, #34
rank up, inspell n/t,
robdarken_,
02-Feb-20 11:47 AM, #35
You're conflating two issues and proposing to solve one...,
SPN,
01-Feb-20 10:43 PM, #16
RE: You're conflating two issues and proposing to solve...,
Battle Applicant (Anonymous),
01-Feb-20 11:33 PM, #18
You still haven't explained how detect invis is going t...,
incognito,
02-Feb-20 02:20 AM, #22
Rank past 25 and kill a mage,
lasentia,
03-Feb-20 09:24 AM, #41
lol,
robdarken_,
31-Jan-20 08:45 PM, #3
I'd argue Magi have the upper hand at low ranks,
incognito,
01-Feb-20 11:42 AM, #5
The AC argument is false.,
SPN,
01-Feb-20 11:45 AM, #8
RE: The AC argument is false.,
incognito,
01-Feb-20 05:32 PM, #10
I've played enough mages to know to pack a hitroll set.,
SPN,
01-Feb-20 10:05 PM, #15
I probably do more AC than you think,
incognito,
02-Feb-20 04:41 AM, #27
Seems silly. ,
Lhydia,
31-Jan-20 06:59 PM, #1
RE: Seems silly. ,
Battle Applicant (Anonymous),
31-Jan-20 07:02 PM, #2
The idea. n/t,
Lhydia,
01-Feb-20 10:44 AM, #4
RE: Seems silly. ,
incognito,
02-Feb-20 02:40 PM, #37
| |
|