The only problem with that is that you (the plural you, as in the imms) are not forcing people to level or face increasingly significant penalties. I am not ignoring the obvious rationale that a level 12 warrior is not going to be fit to be the Marshal of the Fortress, but the general rule is you (again, plural) have made a decision that you want people not to level sit, and to hero, or be singled out for not doing so.

An easy example, a level 41 shaman was not allowed to become a sect leader. We're not talking about a level 20 or something, we're talking about someone who is 40+. Why the institutional position that you need to force people to level? You've already put in place a system where the character will need to deal with it because of distention. So why the added negative titles? The withholding of game perks like leadership/quests etc?