Saagkri | Wed 08-Feb-17 12:48 PM |
Member since 17th Jun 2014
801 posts
| |
|
#66888, "As implemented, code is counter-productive"
|
Bard's shouldn't get penalized in a battle based on how previous battles were fought. Why? Because you just took away the incentive for them to try and not gank in their next battle. They are going to hit the distraction nerf if they fight you 1v1 or 3v1, so they will go 3v1. If they could avoid distraction every battle by not making it non-ganky, they have a real-time incentive to try and solo the fight.
An analogy: If a ranger for some reason spends too much time out of the wilderness and gets a laggy creep (and whatever else), he will make an effort to correct that and be more attentive to where he travels in the future. But, what if you could never correct that and your penalty(s) were permanent? It would NOT encourage you to change your behavior and in fact would temp many to delete and re-roll (or worse, delete and not re-roll).
|
|
|
A bard anti-gank code suggestion
[View all] , Kstatida, Wed 08-Feb-17 09:07 AM
RE: A bard anti-gank code suggestion,
Jormyr,
08-Feb-17 01:38 PM, #23
I knew I was good,
Ganky bard (Anonymous),
08-Feb-17 02:47 PM, #24
RE: I knew I was good,
Jormyr,
08-Feb-17 03:00 PM, #25
It's not about Zagaer,
Kstatida,
08-Feb-17 03:10 PM, #26
RE: It's not about Zagaer,
incognito,
09-Feb-17 02:05 AM, #30
Mind sharing your edge points with me?,
Ganky bard (Anonymous),
09-Feb-17 02:29 AM, #33
Yeah, Daurvryn, give him EP so he can gank,
Murphy,
09-Feb-17 02:36 AM, #34
Worry not, I'm gonna share some with you,
Ganky bard (Anonymous),
09-Feb-17 02:40 AM, #36
RE: Mind sharing your edge points with me?,
incognito,
09-Feb-17 09:52 AM, #38
See above,
Kstatida,
09-Feb-17 09:07 AM, #37
As implemented, code is counter-productive,
Saagkri,
08-Feb-17 12:48 PM #19
I think it's based on current GoM,
Kstatida,
08-Feb-17 12:51 PM, #20
Songs never fail 1 v 1,
lasentia,
08-Feb-17 12:56 PM, #21
Correct,
Saagkri,
09-Feb-17 01:25 PM, #41
Kill 20 people solo and you're back on track,
Kstatida,
10-Feb-17 04:18 AM, #42
It looks to me like this is one thing (not that there a...,
TJHuron,
08-Feb-17 09:58 AM, #6
This isn't about the sole purpose ganking character,
Kstatida,
08-Feb-17 11:31 AM, #9
Been there since my first bard ,
lasentia,
08-Feb-17 12:05 PM, #14
My fiends were useless as a Elf Romantic.,
TMNS,
08-Feb-17 03:44 PM, #27
I agree but not re high int issue,
incognito,
09-Feb-17 02:08 AM, #31
the only edge we can afford these days,
Murphy,
09-Feb-17 02:39 AM, #35
I actually don't like this,
lasentia,
08-Feb-17 09:33 AM, #4
On the other hand,
Kstatida,
08-Feb-17 11:23 AM, #8
Well no,
lasentia,
08-Feb-17 11:51 AM, #10
Warriors don't have AOE attacks.,
Murphy,
08-Feb-17 12:03 PM, #12
That doesn't matter.,
lasentia,
08-Feb-17 12:09 PM, #15
RE: That doesn't matter.,
Kstatida,
08-Feb-17 12:45 PM, #18
I looked at it.,
Murphy,
08-Feb-17 10:15 PM, #29
RE: On the other hand,
Grembolin (Anonymous),
08-Feb-17 11:55 AM, #11
Nobody cares,
Murphy,
08-Feb-17 12:04 PM, #13
Butthurt?,
Grembolin (Anonymous),
08-Feb-17 12:12 PM, #16
About what?,
Murphy,
08-Feb-17 10:40 PM, #28
Haha,
Grembolin (Anonymous),
09-Feb-17 11:05 AM, #39
Your hatred for ragers is obvious,
Kstatida,
09-Feb-17 12:21 PM, #40
You've posted the log.,
Kstatida,
08-Feb-17 12:27 PM, #17
RE: You've posted the log.,
Grembolin (Anonymous),
08-Feb-17 01:21 PM, #22
I'd like to see them lower the anti-gank threshold acro...,
Sarien,
08-Feb-17 09:09 AM, #1
Knowing your bias,
Kstatida,
08-Feb-17 09:12 AM, #2
The current super-gank bunch isn't limited to only gank...,
Sarien,
08-Feb-17 09:14 AM, #3
And you address it how?,
Murphy,
08-Feb-17 09:42 AM, #5
How I'd address it? Probably wouldn't be popular,
Sarien,
08-Feb-17 10:18 AM, #7
RE: The current super-gank bunch isn't limited to only ...,
incognito,
09-Feb-17 02:14 AM, #32
| |
|