I would like to renew the discussion on good killing neutral.

This is from Oltrambel's post, where 5 times paladin made some very pertinent points, all of which I agree with.

Essentially, his point is

1. It's been historical thing and accepted for a long time
2. Playability (Tarus bracers)
3. Visiting chessmasters and elsewhere (if any)
4. Unfair advantage (If Good can't kill neutral for eq, then all things considered, Evil has more access to more equipment. Also because Evil can kill Evil for equipment, and are not bound by the request-within-same-level-region barrier)

On the same topic, why aren't the imms bearing down more on svirfs who act for all intents and purposes, like mass murderers? Why is it you hardly ever see neutrals being made evil, for acting evil?

I disagree with Phaelim's point "If you want that piece of eq on the neutral mob, get i off an evil's corpse". That's very good in theory, but not entirely practical. Firstly, equipment is important to remain competitive. Secondly, all things considered, good classes are at a disadvantage in terms of lethality as opposed to evil classes, and finally, have you seen the hero range lately?