Isildur | Fri 16-Mar-07 10:34 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
5969 posts
| |
|
#17113, "RE: Re"
|
Maybe it would help if we could delineate all the common wield scenarios. I'll give it a go. Tell me if I missed anything.
1. Dual-wielding, want to change both hands.
2. Dual-wielding, want to change main hand w/ another one-handed weapon.
3. Dual-wielding, want to change off hand w/ another one-handed weapon.
4. Dual-wielding, want to wield a single two-handed weapon.
5. Wielding a weapon and a held item, want to swap weapon for another one-handed weapon.
6. Wielding a weapon and held item, want to swap held item for a one-handed weapon.
7. Wielding a weapon and held item, want to swap both for a single two-handed weapon.
8. Main hand is empty (disarmed) and off-hand has weapon, want to wield a one-handed weapon in main.
9. Main hand is empty (disarmed) and off-hand has held item, want to wield a one-handed weapon in main.
For each of these there are three special cases, all of which could be simultaneously in effect:
A: Affected by kotegaeshi (i.e. only one wield/wear spot).
B: The desired action is not possible due to weight restrictions (i.e. you couldn't wield the weapon even if both hands were empty because you're just too weak)
C: The desired action is not possible due to dual-wield restrictions (i.e. you're trying to dual-wield something that's too light/heavy, or you'er trying to main-wield something that's too light/heavy for your dual wield).
(2) and (8) are where I could see the "automatic" behavior haveing undesirable effects, since it could result in your dual-wield being removed in order to complete your main-hand wield request.
(3) could also be weird. What do you want to happen if you try to swap your dual-wield and the weapon being swapped in is too heavy/light to be dual-wielded with whatever's in your main hand? Should the main-wield be removed and the "new" dual-wield be placed in the main hand? That seems wacky.
|
|
|
How do you want wield to react?
[View all] , Zulghinlour, Wed 14-Mar-07 10:41 PM
Dual wield helpfile looks outdated,
DurNominator,
21-Mar-07 06:46 AM, #31
Has this gone live?,
Tac,
20-Mar-07 08:13 AM, #24
No, it has not.,
Zulghinlour,
20-Mar-07 10:39 AM, #25
FNCR,
Zulghinlour,
20-Mar-07 08:43 PM, #26
Cool thanks! nt,
Tac,
20-Mar-07 09:01 PM, #27
RE: FNCR,
Isildur,
20-Mar-07 11:52 PM, #29
Wield command ANSI standard,
Dwoggurd,
17-Mar-07 02:59 PM, #11
RE: Wield command ANSI standard,
Gabe,
19-Mar-07 10:13 AM, #12
Heh,
Dwoggurd,
19-Mar-07 12:15 PM, #13
RE: Heh,
Gabe,
19-Mar-07 12:20 PM, #14
Problem is,
Dwoggurd,
19-Mar-07 03:30 PM, #17
RE: Problem is,
Gabe,
19-Mar-07 08:43 PM, #19
You may notice,
Dwoggurd,
20-Mar-07 03:35 AM, #22
RE: Heh,
Valguarnera,
19-Mar-07 01:07 PM, #15
Actually,
Dwoggurd,
19-Mar-07 03:21 PM, #16
Some implementaion notes,
Dwoggurd,
19-Mar-07 03:39 PM, #18
Nice idea, however it needs one more additional command...,
DurNominator,
20-Mar-07 01:31 AM, #20
Answers,
Dwoggurd,
20-Mar-07 03:33 AM, #21
Clarification,
Dwoggurd,
20-Mar-07 04:26 AM, #23
RE: Clarification,
Zulghinlour,
20-Mar-07 09:35 PM, #28
Re,
Dwoggurd,
21-Mar-07 05:05 AM, #30
I would prefer,
Dwoggurd,
15-Mar-07 11:30 AM, #3
RE: I would prefer,
Zulghinlour,
15-Mar-07 05:08 PM, #4
Re,
Dwoggurd,
16-Mar-07 05:34 AM, #5
While a stochastic dual wield function would be fun,,
Marcus_,
16-Mar-07 07:19 AM, #6
RE: Re,
Isildur,
16-Mar-07 10:34 AM #7
Say no to AI,
Dwoggurd,
16-Mar-07 11:51 AM, #8
RE: Say no to AI,
Isildur,
16-Mar-07 01:17 PM, #9
yes,
Dwoggurd,
16-Mar-07 01:42 PM, #10
RE: How do you want wield to react?,
Isildur,
14-Mar-07 11:56 PM, #1
I don't care either way,
Zulghinlour,
15-Mar-07 10:27 AM, #2
| |
|