Daevryn | Fri 30-Nov-07 02:36 PM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
| |
|
#51, "Currently... (somewhat a tangent)"
|
I'd say the strength of a neutral conjurer is their versatility.
That being said, nearly all conjurer players of any alignment do terribly with the servitor versatility aspect of the class's strategy. Most conjurers decide early on that they're going to summon archons and fire elementals (or whatever) and that's what they always roll with.
I'm not really sure how we draw the line (in general, not specific to the conjurer class) between "we're not changing this, because it dumbs down the class and takes away a cool option for advanced players" and "well, most people who try this class don't enjoy this, so maybe we should change it."
The only thing I'm positive about is that in general I'm against homogenizing the classes. I'd rather CF have a couple character options each player loves to play and a bunch it hates, than a whole bunch that everyone feels lukewarm about.
|
|
|
Making neutral conjurers have an area of expertise
[View all] , EXB, Wed 14-Nov-07 11:57 AM
Making neutral conjurers more viable,
Zulghinlour,
24-Nov-07 02:43 PM, #1
This is more of a general conjurer idea,
Theerkla,
26-Nov-07 01:15 PM, #2
RE: This is more of a general conjurer idea,
Torak,
26-Nov-07 02:02 PM, #3
Or how about this....,
GinGa,
30-Nov-07 10:57 AM, #4
I like this idea. (text),
Lightmage,
30-Nov-07 12:44 PM, #5
Djinn is pretty much same as genie,
DurNominator,
30-Nov-07 12:44 PM, #6
Could use a Maro for the earth critter.,
Mekantos,
30-Nov-07 08:17 PM, #8
Currently... (somewhat a tangent),
Daevryn,
30-Nov-07 02:36 PM #7
| |
|