Subject: "RE: Damroll, unlike hp, is efficient to capitalize on." Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions New Player Q&A Topic #4160
Show all folders

ElerosseThu 18-Jul-13 04:58 PM
Member since 01st Nov 2006
423 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#4170, "RE: Damroll, unlike hp, is efficient to capitalize on."
Edited on Thu 18-Jul-13 04:59 PM

          

>Having high dam leads to shorter fights and thus less need
>for hp. Thus if your dam is already high, you are better off
>taking chilling than soul.

I don't think that is necessarily true. I would think the advantage would always (or almost always) be to the stat that was relatively weak.

For example -
If a character normally has 40 dam roll, then +8 dam is a 20% improvement, while for a character with a 100 dam roll chilling is an 8% increase.

Alternatively, you could see how this could play out by thinking of these numbers as high damage dealer (100 per hit avg) vs low damage dealer (40 per hit avg). Prior to getting chilling the high damage character would need 10 hits to deal at least 1000 points worth of damage while the low damage character would need 25. After chilling the high damage still needs 10 hits (at 9 he only does 972) while the low damage character only needs 21 to get there, effectively gaining 4 rounds.

HP's from soul would be similar it terms of low hp character getting a bigger boast.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

TopicChilling Embrace question for Imms [View all] , BattleNewb (Anonymous), Wed 17-Jul-13 08:15 AM
Reply RE: Chilling Embrace question for Imms, Daevryn, 17-Jul-13 09:48 PM, #1
     Reply I just wonder..., Murphy, 17-Jul-13 10:35 PM, #2
     Reply RE: I just wonder..., Daevryn, 17-Jul-13 11:48 PM, #3
          Reply Damroll, unlike hp, is efficient to capitalize on., Murphy, 18-Jul-13 12:45 AM, #4
          Reply RE: Damroll, unlike hp, is efficient to capitalize on., Elerosse, 18-Jul-13 04:59 PM #8
               Reply RE: Damroll, unlike hp, is efficient to capitalize on., Eskelian, 11-Aug-13 11:00 PM, #10
                    Reply RE: Damroll, unlike hp, is efficient to capitalize on., Elerosse, 12-Aug-13 05:33 PM, #11
          Reply The use of a legacy, TJHuron, 18-Jul-13 09:08 AM, #5
               Reply RE: The use of a legacy, Kalageadon, 18-Jul-13 04:37 PM, #7
                    Reply Chilling was +10 damroll when I had it as Muug., DurNominator, 19-Jul-13 12:52 AM, #9
     Reply RE: Chilling Embrace question for Imms, BattleNewb (Anonymous), 18-Jul-13 11:13 AM, #6
Top General Discussions New Player Q&A Topic #4160 Previous topic | Next topic