Subject: "Sorry you don't make much sense to me" Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions New Player Q&A Topic #12
Show all folders

ArChaosWed 28-Mar-01 07:52 PM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
352 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#53, "Sorry you don't make much sense to me"


  

          

A: since when were forum nicks, previous characters?


>I fail to see how parry
>is ultra-important to perfect for
>a warrior, but is irrelevant
>for a necromancer who fights
>solo often.

word of recall and aura,shield, barrier
plus, oh zombies that can rescue...



>One of the disadvantages of a
>low int/wis class is that
>the abilities will improve more
>slowly. If you can't
>tank Maddie, tank something a
>couple levels down for a
>while.

This is where you really freaking confuse me? I'm already getting 30 exp for killing maddie, how much lower can i go, and how can i possibly go lower yet learn my skills, the whole point of your change is that i don't do that?????????


> If you really
>feel that your dodge/parry levels
>are what is holding your
>character back, tank some semi-tough
>mobs on your own for
>a while.

THATS MY WHOLE POINT! THEY CAN'T!
Maddie is for rank 16's for goodness sake, how the hell is the orc supposed to handle "semi-tough" when he's already getting beaten silly by "child-like" mobs??
Plus throw in for example the 50% wimpy and i'm laughing.
Please can you give me a detailed explanation to the situation i am so obviously missing

> Sometimes you'll
>hit tough streaks where things
>don't improve,

11 hours

> but the code
>affects a lot less than
>the things you claimed in
>your post.

So why change it?

> Also, orcs
>aren't warriors. They're much
>more of a utility class
>than you are giving them
>credit for, and comparing the
>two isn't very accurate.

no, the fact that they tank pathetically and are unable to get an opportunity to practice is the point at hand



>I agree with Trewyn, Scar, Kah,
>and others above: You can
>do just fine without stopping
>to practice in the grand
>scheme of things, mage or
>not. Too many counterexamples
>from recent characters exist to
>not take that viewpoint very
>seriously. I've checked out
>some informed opinions on this,
>from people who have recently
>played giants and such, and
>the myth that a fighting-type
>class is dead in the
>water without 100% everything is
>just that.

again, your spewing extremes here, i don't want 100% in everything, you keep repeating this non desired scenario as some sort of defence.


>My advice is to try sticking
>it out. See how
>your character stacks up in
>PK situations, and whether or
>not your abilities don't hit
>high levels just by running
>around doing your regular thing.
> I think you'll find
>that your character will do
>a lot better than you
>think.

I did, my characters rp went right down the swanee as a respectable warrior when he died in every single confrontation with a necromancer (Within 2 rounds i might add) i swallowed the "don't practice" line and lost gads of con in a stupidly short length of time, it's happened every time i've done it. Mages just abuse you.

In fact i challenge you to make a rager warrior without practicing your skills -at- all and you can prove me wrong, but until you name one, i'm sorry but i don't believe you.



  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

HOT TopicThe Practicing Trap. [View all] , Valguarnera, Fri 23-Mar-01 03:34 PM
Reply RE: The Practicing Trap., Arolin (Guest), 06-Sep-01 08:38 PM, #50
Reply RE: The Practicing Trap., sandeep (Guest), 03-Sep-01 10:28 PM, #45
Reply Newbiedom, nepenthe, 04-Sep-01 09:46 AM, #48
     Reply RE: Newbiedom, sandeep (Guest), 04-Sep-01 09:40 PM, #49
Reply RE: The Practicing Trap., Gilrex (Guest), 19-Apr-01 02:55 PM, #22
Reply Only Phyisical defense skills have changed, not spells ..., Kaldar (Guest), 19-Apr-01 04:26 PM, #23
Reply RE: The Practicing Trap., Magic 8 ball (Guest), 27-Mar-01 11:45 PM, #10
Reply RE: The Practicing Trap., Mynawk (Guest), 29-Mar-01 12:22 PM, #18
Reply RE: The Practicing Trap., Jhyrbian, 27-Mar-01 04:05 PM, #3
Reply RE: Jhyrbian vs. The Practicing Trap., Valguarnera, 27-Mar-01 06:59 PM, #5
Reply RE: The Practicing Trap., Sylvan Bear (Guest), 27-Mar-01 03:46 PM, #2
Reply RE: The Practicing Trap., Valguarnera, 27-Mar-01 07:13 PM, #6
Reply Ill take that dare!, Oddjob, 20-Apr-01 02:26 PM, #24
     Reply Um., nepenthe, 22-Apr-01 01:07 PM, #26
          Reply ...., Oddjob, 23-Apr-01 12:57 PM, #27
               Reply RE: ...., nepenthe, 23-Apr-01 02:04 PM, #28
               Reply RE: ...., Tolingauroth (Guest), 03-Sep-01 11:10 PM, #47
               Reply RE: ...., Boldereth, 13-Mar-03 05:10 PM, #52
Reply Hmm..., Trewyn (Guest), 27-Mar-01 11:27 PM, #9
     Reply RE: Hmm..., Kah (Guest), 28-Mar-01 09:46 AM, #11
     Reply I was beginning to wonder, Scarabaeus, 28-Mar-01 09:55 AM, #12
     Reply A few points Kah., Jhyrbian, 28-Mar-01 11:42 PM, #16
     Reply RE: A few points Kah., Kah (Guest), 29-Mar-01 01:43 PM, #19
          Reply RE: A few points Kah., Tolingauroth (Guest), 02-Sep-01 10:43 PM, #40
               Reply RE: A few points Kah., sandeep (Guest), 03-Sep-01 09:23 PM, #42
     Reply RE: Hmm..., sandeep (Guest), 03-Sep-01 10:16 PM, #44
     Reply RE: Hmm..., TheFirstApostle (Guest), 28-Mar-01 11:29 AM, #13
     Reply RE: Hmm..., sandeep (Guest), 03-Sep-01 10:39 PM, #46
     Reply RE: Hmm..., sandeep (Guest), 03-Sep-01 10:07 PM, #43
Reply ArChaos, post removed, Scarabaeus, 27-Mar-01 12:31 PM, #1
     Reply RE: ArChaos, post removed, ArChaos, 27-Mar-01 05:05 PM, #4
          Reply Nope., Valguarnera, 27-Mar-01 07:20 PM, #7
          Reply ArChaos' quote, text quoted with objectionable portion ..., Valguarnera, 28-Mar-01 04:47 PM, #14
          Reply Sorry you don't make much sense to me, ArChaos, 28-Mar-01 07:52 PM #15
               Reply two points (and the crowd goes wild), nepenthe, 29-Mar-01 12:08 AM, #17
               Reply ArChaos, post removed (advice inside), Scarabaeus, 29-Mar-01 02:53 PM, #20
               Reply RE: two points (and the crowd goes wild), Gabe, 29-Mar-01 03:49 PM, #21
               Reply RE: two points (and the crowd goes wild), sandeep (Guest), 27-Aug-01 03:26 AM, #31
                    Reply if you have to ask. . ., nepenthe, 27-Aug-01 10:15 AM, #32
                    Reply RE: if you have to ask. . ., sandeep (Guest), 27-Aug-01 08:46 PM, #35
                    Reply RE: two points (and the crowd goes wild), Valguarnera, 27-Aug-01 10:22 AM, #33
                         Reply RE: two points (and the crowd goes wild), sandeep (Guest), 27-Aug-01 08:37 PM, #34
               Reply RE: Sorry you don't make much sense to me, Tolingauroth (Guest), 02-Sep-01 11:30 PM, #41
               Reply RE: Sorry you don't make much sense to me, incognito, 05-Mar-03 08:33 AM, #51
          Reply RE: Nope., sandeep (Guest), 27-Aug-01 03:07 AM, #30
               Reply RE: Nope., ArChaos, 28-Aug-01 01:50 AM, #36
                    Reply RE: Nope., sandeep (Guest), 31-Aug-01 07:55 AM, #37
                         Reply RE: Nope., ArChaos, 31-Aug-01 08:29 AM, #38
                              Reply RE: Nope., sandeep (Guest), 31-Aug-01 10:33 PM, #39
          Reply RE: ArChaos, post removed, Sandello, 27-Mar-01 07:26 PM, #8
               Reply RE: ArChaos, post removed, Oddjob, 20-Apr-01 02:35 PM, #25
                    Reply RE: ArChaos, post removed, Isildur, 04-May-01 06:57 PM, #29
Top General Discussions New Player Q&A Topic #12 Previous topic | Next topic