|
Krilcov | Mon 05-Feb-07 08:34 PM |
Member since 05th Aug 2006
36 posts
|     |
|
#996, "Not being an expert on the subject or anything...."
|
I would say drugs are bad and we could be sued if they are proved innocent of the crimes, and the bad PR sessions recieved will ballon up into something far worse than we could ever be attempting to prevent in the first place. Truth be Heard.
|
|
|
 To torture, or not to torture?
[View all] , jasmin, Mon 15-Jan-07 03:22 PM
  A Better Question.,
Razoul,
17-Jan-07 12:27 PM, #12
What about drugs?,
Eskelian,
17-Jan-07 10:09 AM, #8
 RE: What about drugs?,
Daevryn,
17-Jan-07 10:26 AM, #10
RE: What about drugs?,
Eskelian,
17-Jan-07 10:49 PM, #13
 This is pretty sick/funny/interesting,
Marcus_,
18-Jan-07 03:23 AM, #14
The experiment is badass.,
elmeri_,
04-Feb-07 05:51 AM, #15
Not being an expert on the subject or anything....,
Krilcov,
05-Feb-07 08:34 PM #16
RE: To torture, or not to torture?,
Valguarnera ,
15-Jan-07 04:25 PM, #5
RE: To torture, or not to torture?,
Isildur,
15-Jan-07 06:48 PM, #6
RE: To torture, or not to torture?,
DurNominator,
16-Jan-07 08:24 PM, #7
RE: To torture, or not to torture?,
Eskelian,
17-Jan-07 10:15 AM, #9
The usual legal-guy answer I've heard:,
Valguarnera,
17-Jan-07 10:41 AM, #11
Torture is only morally acceptable when used by Jack Ba...,
Daevryn,
15-Jan-07 03:36 PM, #2
Where is he from? (n/t),
Rodriguez,
15-Jan-07 04:02 PM, #3
24 (TV show),
Daevryn,
15-Jan-07 04:22 PM, #4
Easy one: No toture /nt,
Rodriguez,
15-Jan-07 03:32 PM, #1
| |
|
