Subject: "RE: I thought every socket was a file descriptor on Solaris" Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top Non-CF Discussion "What Does RL Stand For?" Topic #975
Show all folders

IsildurSun 28-Jan-07 07:41 PM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
5969 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#980, "RE: I thought every socket was a file descriptor on Solaris"


          

That might be the case. When I said the OS isn't the "limiting factor", I meant that your app is more likely to have a problem adequately handling pathologically large numbers of sockets than Solaris is. (This, contrasted with Windows, which sort of barfs when you try to open too many sockets, or open & close them at too high a frequency).

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

TopicSockets. CF limit on connections? [View all] , TheDude, Fri 26-Jan-07 09:09 PM
Reply RE: Sockets. CF limit on connections?, Isildur, 28-Jan-07 05:24 PM, #1
     Reply I thought every socket was a file descriptor on Solaris, Theerkla, 28-Jan-07 07:20 PM, #2
          Reply RE: I thought every socket was a file descriptor on Sol..., Isildur, 28-Jan-07 07:41 PM #3
               Reply Thanks. Both of you seem to be on it., TheDude, 30-Jan-07 12:52 AM, #4
                    Reply Probably aren't going to get that info about CF, Tac, 30-Jan-07 09:12 AM, #5
                    Reply Not really.., Marcus_, 30-Jan-07 11:12 AM, #7
                         Reply RE: Not really.., Isildur, 30-Jan-07 06:53 PM, #8
                              Reply But that would be multiplaying, which is wrong and agai..., Marcus_, 05-Feb-07 07:12 AM, #9
                    Reply RE: Thanks. Both of you seem to be on it., Isildur, 30-Jan-07 10:45 AM, #6
Top Non-CF Discussion "What Does RL Stand For?" Topic #975 Previous topic | Next topic