Eskelian | Wed 17-Jan-07 10:15 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
2023 posts
| |
|
#964, "RE: To torture, or not to torture?"
|
Yeah but a point blank question...
There's multiple nuclear devices in every major city in the world. I happen to know where they are, only I'm not telling. Assuming you can't get me to tell, millions of people will die.
Would you :
1) Do nothing. 2) Use physical torture. 3) Use drugs.
I tend to agree that CIA-style water torture on every schmuck you capture in Iraq is immoral and shouldn't be done, but I think there are extreme circumstances where risking bad information is still better than doing nothing at all.
|
|
|
To torture, or not to torture?
[View all] , jasmin, Mon 15-Jan-07 03:22 PM
A Better Question.,
Razoul,
17-Jan-07 12:27 PM, #12
What about drugs?,
Eskelian,
17-Jan-07 10:09 AM, #8
RE: What about drugs?,
Daevryn,
17-Jan-07 10:26 AM, #10
RE: What about drugs?,
Eskelian,
17-Jan-07 10:49 PM, #13
This is pretty sick/funny/interesting,
Marcus_,
18-Jan-07 03:23 AM, #14
The experiment is badass.,
elmeri_,
04-Feb-07 05:51 AM, #15
Not being an expert on the subject or anything....,
Krilcov,
05-Feb-07 08:34 PM, #16
RE: To torture, or not to torture?,
Valguarnera,
15-Jan-07 04:25 PM, #5
RE: To torture, or not to torture?,
Isildur,
15-Jan-07 06:48 PM, #6
RE: To torture, or not to torture?,
DurNominator,
16-Jan-07 08:24 PM, #7
RE: To torture, or not to torture?,
Eskelian,
17-Jan-07 10:15 AM #9
The usual legal-guy answer I've heard:,
Valguarnera,
17-Jan-07 10:41 AM, #11
Torture is only morally acceptable when used by Jack Ba...,
Daevryn,
15-Jan-07 03:36 PM, #2
Where is he from? (n/t),
Rodriguez,
15-Jan-07 04:02 PM, #3
24 (TV show),
Daevryn,
15-Jan-07 04:22 PM, #4
Easy one: No toture /nt,
Rodriguez,
15-Jan-07 03:32 PM, #1
| |
|