Lyristeon | Sun 13-Jan-08 05:10 PM |
Member since 02nd Jan 2004
1282 posts
| |
|
#65258, "RE: Why Kanaev's pk ratio is ridiculous."
|
>I stand by my statement that Kanaev isn't all that he's >cracked up to be. I used demons, because I didn't have the >hp's to get around the severe limitation of devil turning. >What is devil turning? When your character gets below 25% >health, you die because your devil turns on you. The only way >you're not going to die, is if you land a 600 mana dismissal >or if you get help killing your pissed off devil. > >A standard pk loss for an evil conjurer looks like this: >Fighting someone. Get low on health or servitor turns on you. > Word, teleport or flee away. Try to deal with angry >servitors. Die. Do you ???think??? that the nofol pet bug >might help here?
You are claiming it aided him with pks. It did not. > >As a devil user, an opponent of Kanaev would only need to push >him down past the 25% health mark to see him dead. Why didn't >this happen during Kanaev's life? Well, he abused the nofol >pet bug. When his devil's turned, he typed nofol pet twice, >and *poof* devil gone. When the bug was fixxed, guess what >happened? Kanaev started dying to his devils (just like any >other conjurer will). He got pwned up just like us noobs. >Here's an example: > >Mon Mar 5 19:59:07 2007 by 'Daevryn' at level 51 (487 hrs): >You know, you can put extra mana in a dismissal. It helps when >ice devil is brutally humping on you. > >The second point I am going to stand by, is that Kanaev had a >strong advantage in becoming Chancellor. From the story I can >put together from immortal comments, Kanaev's comments and >player comments, Kanaev was a poor roleplayer. Eshval said he >only got the position because he was the best candidate at the >time.
Wrong. Don't misquote the imms. Eshval posted: Made Chancellor as being the most qualified at present. That doesn't say anything about him only getting the position because of it. It is simply, He is the most qualified, which means out of all the scions, he was the best one.
Now I know us "noobs" can't know the super secret >mechanisms at work here, but I'm willing to bet a chancellor >conjurer's devil gets quite a few perks.
I will leave this to the noob in you. It's just another thing that you don't know what you are talking about. Heck, there weren't even edges.
> >My advice for future evil conjurers. Hit level 51. Train >hps. Stack up as much +hp gear as you can. Get into Scion, >and get used to always using despoil. Evil conjurers RAPE =). > Just get used to the idea of dying to your servitors. > >
|
|
|
Kriis deleted.
[View all] , oero, Sun 13-Jan-08 11:12 AM
Locked on account of plain old stupid. (n/t),
Valguarnera,
13-Jan-08 09:43 PM, #43
RE: Kriis deleted.,
Daevryn,
13-Jan-08 04:44 PM, #19
Whaaa?,
Kriis (Guest),
13-Jan-08 04:48 PM, #20
RE: Whaaa?,
Lyristeon,
13-Jan-08 05:12 PM, #24
RE: Whaaa?,
Daevryn,
13-Jan-08 08:59 PM, #41
This makes me happy,
Nikartich (Guest),
13-Jan-08 05:29 PM, #25
I full sacced someone? Lol.,
Kriis (Guest),
13-Jan-08 06:58 PM, #30
Don't deny it. And did you play Caliana,
Nikartich (Guest),
13-Jan-08 07:09 PM, #32
I didn't full sac anybody as Kriis. -nt-,
Kriis (Guest),
13-Jan-08 08:49 PM, #39
I don't even know who Caliana is. -nt-,
Kriis (Guest),
13-Jan-08 08:50 PM, #40
About fullsack,
Dervish,
13-Jan-08 07:46 PM, #38
What I think of Kriis.,
RangerDanger (Guest),
13-Jan-08 07:22 PM, #34
As for demons killing conjurer,
Dervish,
13-Jan-08 04:03 PM, #13
I think (not sure),
Kriis (Guest),
13-Jan-08 04:14 PM, #15
RE: Kriis deleted.,
Jhyrbian,
13-Jan-08 01:06 PM, #6
That last charge. :(,
Joogin (Guest),
13-Jan-08 11:59 AM, #3
The whole reason I deleted.,
Kriis (Guest),
13-Jan-08 03:32 PM, #11
Kanaev style ownage.,
oero,
13-Jan-08 11:42 AM, #1
RE: Kanaev style ownage.,
Gaunt Victim (Guest),
13-Jan-08 11:46 AM, #2
The class Pwns. WTF are you talking about?,
Kriis (Guest),
13-Jan-08 03:40 PM, #12
You are a tool. That is all. n/t,
Lightmaged (Guest),
13-Jan-08 12:01 PM, #4
Actually I want to add one thing...,
Lightmaged (Guest),
13-Jan-08 06:58 PM, #31
Way off base here.,
Lyristeon,
13-Jan-08 12:58 PM, #5
Search _IS_ overpowered! (quotes),
Kriis (Guest),
13-Jan-08 03:07 PM, #7
And you did better how?,
GinGa,
13-Jan-08 03:14 PM, #8
It's painful to lose a hero,
Kriis (Guest),
13-Jan-08 03:26 PM, #10
RE: It's painful to lose a hero,
Lyristeon,
13-Jan-08 05:03 PM, #22
HAHAHAH,
Kriis (Guest),
13-Jan-08 06:04 PM, #27
Once again, you are wrong,
N b M (Guest),
13-Jan-08 06:33 PM, #28
What's funny is.,
Lyristeon,
13-Jan-08 06:44 PM, #29
If I wasnt Krilcov myslf, I would ask if you where..Ass,
Nikartich (Guest),
13-Jan-08 07:18 PM, #33
This is impossible to understand gibberish. -nt-,
Kriis (Guest),
13-Jan-08 07:31 PM, #36
Feigning ignorance will get you no where.,
Krilcov Krieger,
13-Jan-08 07:42 PM, #37
Why Kanaev's pk ratio is ridiculous.,
Kriis (Guest),
13-Jan-08 03:21 PM, #9
I partially agree,
N b M (Guest),
13-Jan-08 04:09 PM, #14
I didn't fail. Therefore, I didn't blame anyone for my...,
Kriis (Guest),
13-Jan-08 04:18 PM, #16
You are crying, otherwise you wouldn't be making excuse...,
N b M (Guest),
13-Jan-08 04:29 PM, #17
RE: I didn't fail. Therefore, I didn't blame anyone fo...,
Ridiculous (Guest),
13-Jan-08 04:35 PM, #18
RE: Why Kanaev's pk ratio is ridiculous.,
Lyristeon,
13-Jan-08 05:10 PM #23
More con = more kills. -nt- Title edited for suckines...,
Kriis (Guest),
13-Jan-08 06:45 PM, #26
RE: Search _IS_ overpowered! (quotes),
Lyristeon,
13-Jan-08 05:02 PM, #21
OH do shut up. You were wrong. -nt-,
Kriis (Guest),
13-Jan-08 07:30 PM, #35
See above...Daevryn Whaaa? nt,
Lyristeon,
13-Jan-08 09:06 PM, #42
| |
|