Subject: "RE: Search _IS_ overpowered! (quotes)" This topic is locked.
Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions The Battlefield Topic #65229
Show all folders

LyristeonSun 13-Jan-08 05:00 PM
Member since 02nd Jan 2004
1282 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list
#65256, "RE: Search _IS_ overpowered! (quotes)"
Edited on Sun 13-Jan-08 05:02 PM

          

>I sometimes wished I could get a better handle on your RP,
>but our times ended up not meshing and the language barrier
>was a bit of an issue.
>-Valkenar

Okay, so they didn't play the same times much and there was a language barrier issue. Nothing bad about that.
>
>Yaw, i actually think that i sucked at RP.
>-Kanaev

That's his view which is fine.
>
>You were ridiculously powerful. I don't mean this to slight
>you, but I'm not sure how much of that was "you" and how much
>was "chancellor conjurer".
>-Waserax

Powerful and doesn't mean to slight him. Had a hard time reading him.

>
>I liked Kanaev, especially towards the end, because you seemed
>like some guy who was really just playing to have fun and not
>sweating the small stuff.
>-Sekhuroth

This is a compliment, not getting your point here.
>
>Kanaev you were a great character, the only odd thing, and
>this is so minor I'm almost embarrased to point it out, but
>what I noticed is that you would occasionally go slightly OOC
>that made me raise an eyebrow. Regardless, neither of us were
>very talkative characters but we were both very pragmatic.
>-Haratzi

Great character that occasionally went ooc? You focus on the occasionally slightly part and totally neglect the great part? Point out your great characters.
>
>Wed Jan 10 06:20:30 2007 by 'Eshval' at level 51 (242 hrs):
>Made Chancellor as being the most qualified at present.
>-Eshval

Umm, that's not a slight. He was the most qualified person for chancellor and was promoted.
>
>Tue Jan 16 21:17:36 2007 by 'Eshval' at level 51 (294 hrs):
>Okay, the lack of standout personality, Kanaev is doing a
>pretty decent job of running things and garnering a nice pk
>ratio.
>-Eshval

Perhaps the language barrier made him less talkative. But, the rest of it is positive.
>
>Wed Feb 28 14:33:50 2007 by 'Twist' at level 51 (468 hrs):
>Few of us gave some thought to a CON quest for this guy, but
>considering that he (wittingly or unwittingly) made use of a
>bug that allowed him to nof pets to get rid of angry servitors
>and probably would have died an extra 30 times to angry
>devil/demon types, I kinda feel he got his CON quest. He also
>hasn't really been looking for one, as far as I have seen.

Hence the reason I said the bug had nothing to do with him being a killer.
>
>Sat Mar 31 10:01:38 2007 by 'Daevryn' at level 51 (577 hrs):
>One death left; I gave him two trains and an echo based on the
>coolness of this character and his long and consistent RP, he
>can prolong lis life if he chooses. He immediately trained con
>twice.
>

Yeah, that's a very positive action by an implementor because of coolness.

How about the ones you chose to ignore?

Racking lots of kills. Very nice. Eshval.

Racking up a pretty nice pk record...very sneakily. Eshval.

An Immortal added 1000 exp for: I give this guy some credit: Even as the only Scion on outnumbered by EVERYone, he's still picking people off. Immortal.

Worthy of a title! Eshval.

dudes got some serious balls - raiding empire after killing one of 3 imperials in range, has the other two running frantically. Another (bard) logs in and hits him with some maledicts, he just kills the bard and keeps kicking as. Twist.

Allowed Hunsobo to drive Hunsobo into a death...very pretty. Eshval.

I have to say, Kanaev keeps going and bringing ruin, even though often alone. Eshval.

Ilesin: Kanaev painful - that about sums it up. Eshval.

Overall, this guy is a bad ####er. Nicely played. Daevryn

Sekhuroth: Where were we? Kanaev: We were going to kill everyone. Daevryn. Followed by An Immortal added 1000 exp for: What the hell, I laughed, have some XP. For it.

All in all, you are taking pot shots at the wrong character.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy

HOT Locked TopicKriis deleted. [View all] , oero, Sun 13-Jan-08 11:12 AM
Reply Locked on account of plain old stupid. (n/t), Valguarnera, 13-Jan-08 09:43 PM, #43
Reply RE: Kriis deleted., Daevryn, 13-Jan-08 04:44 PM, #19
Reply Whaaa?, Kriis (Guest), 13-Jan-08 04:48 PM, #20
Reply RE: Whaaa?, Lyristeon, 13-Jan-08 05:12 PM, #24
Reply RE: Whaaa?, Daevryn, 13-Jan-08 08:59 PM, #41
Reply This makes me happy, Nikartich (Guest), 13-Jan-08 05:29 PM, #25
Reply I full sacced someone? Lol., Kriis (Guest), 13-Jan-08 06:58 PM, #30
Reply Don't deny it. And did you play Caliana, Nikartich (Guest), 13-Jan-08 07:09 PM, #32
     Reply I didn't full sac anybody as Kriis. -nt-, Kriis (Guest), 13-Jan-08 08:49 PM, #39
     Reply I don't even know who Caliana is. -nt-, Kriis (Guest), 13-Jan-08 08:50 PM, #40
Reply About fullsack, Dervish, 13-Jan-08 07:46 PM, #38
Reply What I think of Kriis., RangerDanger (Guest), 13-Jan-08 07:22 PM, #34
Reply As for demons killing conjurer, Dervish, 13-Jan-08 04:03 PM, #13
Reply I think (not sure), Kriis (Guest), 13-Jan-08 04:14 PM, #15
Reply RE: Kriis deleted., Jhyrbian, 13-Jan-08 01:06 PM, #6
Reply That last charge. :(, Joogin (Guest), 13-Jan-08 11:59 AM, #3
Reply The whole reason I deleted., Kriis (Guest), 13-Jan-08 03:32 PM, #11
Reply Kanaev style ownage., oero, 13-Jan-08 11:42 AM, #1
     Reply RE: Kanaev style ownage., Gaunt Victim (Guest), 13-Jan-08 11:46 AM, #2
     Reply The class Pwns. WTF are you talking about?, Kriis (Guest), 13-Jan-08 03:40 PM, #12
     Reply You are a tool. That is all. n/t, Lightmaged (Guest), 13-Jan-08 12:01 PM, #4
     Reply Actually I want to add one thing..., Lightmaged (Guest), 13-Jan-08 06:58 PM, #31
     Reply Way off base here., Lyristeon, 13-Jan-08 12:58 PM, #5
          Reply Search _IS_ overpowered! (quotes), Kriis (Guest), 13-Jan-08 03:07 PM, #7
               Reply And you did better how?, GinGa, 13-Jan-08 03:14 PM, #8
               Reply It's painful to lose a hero, Kriis (Guest), 13-Jan-08 03:26 PM, #10
                    Reply RE: It's painful to lose a hero, Lyristeon, 13-Jan-08 05:03 PM, #22
                         Reply HAHAHAH, Kriis (Guest), 13-Jan-08 06:04 PM, #27
                              Reply Once again, you are wrong, N b M (Guest), 13-Jan-08 06:33 PM, #28
                              Reply What's funny is., Lyristeon, 13-Jan-08 06:44 PM, #29
                              Reply If I wasnt Krilcov myslf, I would ask if you where..Ass, Nikartich (Guest), 13-Jan-08 07:18 PM, #33
                                   Reply This is impossible to understand gibberish. -nt-, Kriis (Guest), 13-Jan-08 07:31 PM, #36
                                        Reply Feigning ignorance will get you no where., Krilcov Krieger, 13-Jan-08 07:42 PM, #37
               Reply Why Kanaev's pk ratio is ridiculous., Kriis (Guest), 13-Jan-08 03:21 PM, #9
               Reply I partially agree, N b M (Guest), 13-Jan-08 04:09 PM, #14
               Reply I didn't fail. Therefore, I didn't blame anyone for my..., Kriis (Guest), 13-Jan-08 04:18 PM, #16
                    Reply You are crying, otherwise you wouldn't be making excuse..., N b M (Guest), 13-Jan-08 04:29 PM, #17
                    Reply RE: I didn't fail. Therefore, I didn't blame anyone fo..., Ridiculous (Guest), 13-Jan-08 04:35 PM, #18
               Reply RE: Why Kanaev's pk ratio is ridiculous., Lyristeon, 13-Jan-08 05:10 PM, #23
                    Reply More con = more kills. -nt- Title edited for suckines..., Kriis (Guest), 13-Jan-08 06:45 PM, #26
               Reply RE: Search _IS_ overpowered! (quotes), Lyristeon, 13-Jan-08 05:02 PM #21
                    Reply OH do shut up. You were wrong. -nt-, Kriis (Guest), 13-Jan-08 07:30 PM, #35
                         Reply See above...Daevryn Whaaa? nt, Lyristeon, 13-Jan-08 09:06 PM, #42
Top General Discussions The Battlefield Topic #65229 Previous topic | Next topic