Subject: "Kanaev style ownage." This topic is locked.
Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions The Battlefield Topic #65229
Show all folders

oeroSun 13-Jan-08 11:28 AM
Member since 13th Nov 2007
45 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#65230, "Kanaev style ownage."
Edited on Sun 13-Jan-08 11:42 AM

          

Before anyone goes off on how awesome Kanaev was...

The clear reason Kanaev's character dominated is that he exploited a bug.

It also didn't hurt that Kanaev became leader of Scion in about 200 hours despite piss poor roleplaying. By the way, I didn't know the guy. This is coming from what imm's & players said about him through the forums.

The most important job for the conjurer is to reach level 51 without conloss. This is why Kanaev owned so much: He didn't die to his own servitors. Pretty much the only thing that could kill me were my own servitors. In long fights, it's easy to neglect your demon. I can't count how many times my demon or devil would turn on me midround combat in pvp. I'd word or teleport & try to deal with it.. but that never really worked. If a servitor turns on you, it's pretty much a done deal and you're dead. If I could of nofol pet like Kanaev, I would of prevented 90% of my deaths. For those of you who think that dismissal is an answer: try it yourself against a high level servitor.

That said, if you plan on playing an evil conjurer, do yourself a favor and don't do ANYTHING until you reach level 51. Kanaev had only 8 pkills before he reached hero. That's pathetically small. I realize now what he knew. PVP before 51 is a waste of time, and can result in conloss. You need to invest as many trains as you can into hp.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy

HOT Locked TopicKriis deleted. [View all] , oero, Sun 13-Jan-08 11:12 AM
Reply Locked on account of plain old stupid. (n/t), Valguarnera, 13-Jan-08 09:43 PM, #43
Reply RE: Kriis deleted., Daevryn, 13-Jan-08 04:44 PM, #19
Reply Whaaa?, Kriis (Guest), 13-Jan-08 04:48 PM, #20
Reply RE: Whaaa?, Lyristeon, 13-Jan-08 05:12 PM, #24
Reply RE: Whaaa?, Daevryn, 13-Jan-08 08:59 PM, #41
Reply This makes me happy, Nikartich (Guest), 13-Jan-08 05:29 PM, #25
Reply I full sacced someone? Lol., Kriis (Guest), 13-Jan-08 06:58 PM, #30
Reply Don't deny it. And did you play Caliana, Nikartich (Guest), 13-Jan-08 07:09 PM, #32
     Reply I didn't full sac anybody as Kriis. -nt-, Kriis (Guest), 13-Jan-08 08:49 PM, #39
     Reply I don't even know who Caliana is. -nt-, Kriis (Guest), 13-Jan-08 08:50 PM, #40
Reply About fullsack, Dervish, 13-Jan-08 07:46 PM, #38
Reply What I think of Kriis., RangerDanger (Guest), 13-Jan-08 07:22 PM, #34
Reply As for demons killing conjurer, Dervish, 13-Jan-08 04:03 PM, #13
Reply I think (not sure), Kriis (Guest), 13-Jan-08 04:14 PM, #15
Reply RE: Kriis deleted., Jhyrbian, 13-Jan-08 01:06 PM, #6
Reply That last charge. :(, Joogin (Guest), 13-Jan-08 11:59 AM, #3
Reply The whole reason I deleted., Kriis (Guest), 13-Jan-08 03:32 PM, #11
Reply Kanaev style ownage., oero, 13-Jan-08 11:42 AM #1
     Reply RE: Kanaev style ownage., Gaunt Victim (Guest), 13-Jan-08 11:46 AM, #2
     Reply The class Pwns. WTF are you talking about?, Kriis (Guest), 13-Jan-08 03:40 PM, #12
     Reply You are a tool. That is all. n/t, Lightmaged (Guest), 13-Jan-08 12:01 PM, #4
     Reply Actually I want to add one thing..., Lightmaged (Guest), 13-Jan-08 06:58 PM, #31
     Reply Way off base here., Lyristeon, 13-Jan-08 12:58 PM, #5
          Reply Search _IS_ overpowered! (quotes), Kriis (Guest), 13-Jan-08 03:07 PM, #7
               Reply And you did better how?, GinGa, 13-Jan-08 03:14 PM, #8
               Reply It's painful to lose a hero, Kriis (Guest), 13-Jan-08 03:26 PM, #10
                    Reply RE: It's painful to lose a hero, Lyristeon, 13-Jan-08 05:03 PM, #22
                         Reply HAHAHAH, Kriis (Guest), 13-Jan-08 06:04 PM, #27
                              Reply Once again, you are wrong, N b M (Guest), 13-Jan-08 06:33 PM, #28
                              Reply What's funny is., Lyristeon, 13-Jan-08 06:44 PM, #29
                              Reply If I wasnt Krilcov myslf, I would ask if you where..Ass, Nikartich (Guest), 13-Jan-08 07:18 PM, #33
                                   Reply This is impossible to understand gibberish. -nt-, Kriis (Guest), 13-Jan-08 07:31 PM, #36
                                        Reply Feigning ignorance will get you no where., Krilcov Krieger, 13-Jan-08 07:42 PM, #37
               Reply Why Kanaev's pk ratio is ridiculous., Kriis (Guest), 13-Jan-08 03:21 PM, #9
               Reply I partially agree, N b M (Guest), 13-Jan-08 04:09 PM, #14
               Reply I didn't fail. Therefore, I didn't blame anyone for my..., Kriis (Guest), 13-Jan-08 04:18 PM, #16
                    Reply You are crying, otherwise you wouldn't be making excuse..., N b M (Guest), 13-Jan-08 04:29 PM, #17
                    Reply RE: I didn't fail. Therefore, I didn't blame anyone fo..., Ridiculous (Guest), 13-Jan-08 04:35 PM, #18
               Reply RE: Why Kanaev's pk ratio is ridiculous., Lyristeon, 13-Jan-08 05:10 PM, #23
                    Reply More con = more kills. -nt- Title edited for suckines..., Kriis (Guest), 13-Jan-08 06:45 PM, #26
               Reply RE: Search _IS_ overpowered! (quotes), Lyristeon, 13-Jan-08 05:02 PM, #21
                    Reply OH do shut up. You were wrong. -nt-, Kriis (Guest), 13-Jan-08 07:30 PM, #35
                         Reply See above...Daevryn Whaaa? nt, Lyristeon, 13-Jan-08 09:06 PM, #42
Top General Discussions The Battlefield Topic #65229 Previous topic | Next topic