|
#81584, "RE: (AGE DEATH) [BATTLE] Susubienko Glomska the Swift S..."
|
>I felt like this character had quite a bit of substance. >Having read the role and watching from a distance, I felt like >you played the character as it should have been played >although she leaned a bit more towards evil than neutral. > >You're right in some regards, I think the playerbase is a >little more in tune with the feelings and emotions of the >player rather than the character standing in front of them. >I'd like to see a little more checking out of the player at >the skull but that's a humble opinion.
I agree.
> >In the Thror quest you played a great role and did a great job >of spearheading my return. Many thanks. Without you or >Woldrun I really wouldn't have come back for another month. I >also did quite a bit of planning for the quest but couldn't >deliver in game due to screwing up emotes and commands. >Thanks for your patience on this. >
Things like that are one of the reasons I, and I know others, play in the first place. Don't thank me, thank you.
>I will say that several things did rub me raw. You prayed - a >lot. It got a little annoying at times. >
Alright, I'll work on that. It would be helpful if you might specify which types of prays though. The "I dedicate this to you, Lady Yean" or things like that? "There is a weird echo here, thought you'd want to know" stuff? "I found a bunch of equ here and think it might be a multi-charring possibility" stuff? Those are just examples, I know there were other kinds. Just let me know what. I'm really honestly asking, not being sarcastic. I don't need excess reasons for people to harsh on my characters.
>I felt like you weren't content with your reward. I had >several other rewards lined up but I felt like the con was >really more suitable. >
I wasn't. Not at all. And part of the reason is your fault, I have to say. You *asked* me what I want. So I told you. I even provided the item for you to "cobble" up from. If you hadn't asked me what I want, I wouldn't have asked about it a few times like I did. But you did, so I did. And as I mentioned below, normally, getting leader-ified means you get some con. I definitely would much rather have had something cool, some of that hidden lore we all talked about, anything at all, than 2 con. Two con by the way which meant I ended up at a negative 1 con for the quest, with nothing else to show for it. And yes, I know, we all do it for the fun, but we all also like the fun extra stuff we get when we participate and spend about 50-100 hours on a quest over two months and drop 3 con. Something. I got 2 con. Which I was going to get anyway from Yean, but then didn't because you gave it to me for your quest. You understand how that can be frustrating I hope. And no, I'm not saying I should have gotten some crazy quest skill that was an I win button. And you know that what I asked for was really nothing special game balance wise. So I hope people don't chime in with something like that.
>Keepin in character (as mentioned above) also means you have >to understand your own mortality with specific mobs and >Immortals. You crossed that line with the Wyrm in my quest > he should have just smashed most of the villagers that >snuffed themselves at him) and your comment towards Thror late >in your life. >
Maybe, but as you say, then we all did it. We were all doing the same thing at that point, I wasn't any different than Woldrun or Kale or the others. We can disagree on whether someone should have bent their neck and given up pride or not, I know Woldrun and I and most of the villagers think not, but you obviously do. And that's cool, we're allowed to disagree. But I don't see this as a criticism of me more than anyone else in the village at the time.
>I really, really didn't want to interrupt your drill and >understand the effort you put towards it - but a Lich was >online and wasn't being threatened by a single Villager. He >was killing people left and right with no threat to his >actions. It was almost an abomination to a God of Battle - >that his village wasn't out hunting it. >
Yeah, I gotta say, I think this was a ####ish move. You've been a good guy over the years and I don't think it's a game changer, but really, it was total crap. Let's be honest, it was *not* an ic thing. You weren't even visible for the drill. But you made the *OOC* decision to vis and then tell everyone to go hunt the lich. You can't say it was an abomination to you because you weren't even there, weren't even visible, until you decided you wanted to be, as you, the player, to go ahead and do what you did. That was a pure ooc decision. And it was wrong, in my opinion. Wrong for the game. PK'ing happens all the time. It's what people, especially ragers, are doing virtually 24/7. And the lich has been around for months, and will be for months. So why this one night, the one unique night when a player had organized and sponsored an event, did you choose to make a point of saying people should hunt the lich? It's just as ic realistic to say that having the complete drill would make them better hunters to actually succeed in hunting the lich, but cutting it off deprived them of that education. Whatver. You ruined the exact thing the staff always talk about, having players create rp, having players drive events, having players make things happen, and not just waiting for imms to do stuff. I did that, and you came down and slammed it shut midway through.
And as an aside, if you look at pbf's, you'll see that anyone who ever sponsors and runs an event gets some imm love for it, even if it's just a minute 20 xp, just a pat on the head to say hey, good job, thanks for doing it. Susu got nothing. And I don't much care about it, but it is more support for my point elsewhere about not getting imm love, at all.
>From an Imm standpoint there is a level of respect (as a >BattleRager) and as a mortal that you have to uphold. It was >water under the bridge after I addressed it but it definately >wasn't a bright spot on your resume for this character. > >Well played. Hopefully all the negativity doesn't dissuade >you from creating another character. >
It won't, I'll be back soon enough. If for nothing else I need a char to go into the village and see Susu's name on the pillar!
>FYI - That was a crazy wall of text!
|
|
|
(AGE DEATH) [BATTLE] Susubienko Glomska the Swift Strok...
[View all] , Death_Angel, Tue 16-Jun-09 04:11 PM
Locking this for both Thror and Graach's benefit nt,
Rayihn,
18-Jun-09 12:40 PM, #96
RE: (AGE DEATH) [BATTLE] Susubienko Glomska the Swift S...,
NotaHater (Guest),
18-Jun-09 03:20 AM, #89
RE: (AGE DEATH) [BATTLE] Susubienko Glomska the Swift S...,
Susu (Guest),
18-Jun-09 12:26 PM, #95
RE: (AGE DEATH) [BATTLE] Susubienko Glomska the Swift S...,
HammerSong,
16-Jun-09 10:08 PM, #52
I still maintain,,
Forsakenz (Guest),
16-Jun-09 11:35 PM, #53
RE: (AGE DEATH) [BATTLE] Susubienko Glomska the Swift S...,
Susu (Guest),
17-Jun-09 12:17 AM #57
RE: (AGE DEATH) [BATTLE] Susubienko Glomska the Swift S...,
HammerSong,
17-Jun-09 02:12 PM, #67
RE: (AGE DEATH) [BATTLE] Susubienko Glomska the Swift S...,
Susu (Guest),
17-Jun-09 11:41 PM, #76
####in' wow. Wow. -nt-,
Mek (Guest),
18-Jun-09 12:30 AM, #88
RE: (AGE DEATH) [BATTLE] Susubienko Glomska the Swift S...,
HammerSong,
18-Jun-09 08:18 AM, #90
- an addendum,
HammerSong,
18-Jun-09 09:36 AM, #91
RE: - an addendum,
Susu (Guest),
18-Jun-09 12:22 PM, #94
how do you write the same thing over and over again,
Jhyrbian,
18-Jun-09 10:27 AM, #92
Winner winner chicken dinner. (nt).,
Iunna,
18-Jun-09 10:30 AM, #93
RE: (AGE DEATH) [BATTLE] Susubienko Glomska the Swift S...,
Iunna,
17-Jun-09 05:54 PM, #74
All I can say is, well done, to hell with the haters,
Rogue,
16-Jun-09 08:32 PM, #36
RE: (AGE DEATH) [BATTLE] Susubienko Glomska the Swift S...,
Susubienko,
16-Jun-09 08:26 PM, #35
Ain't nuthin' but a G thing baby.,
Iunna,
16-Jun-09 08:44 PM, #37
RE: Ain't nuthin' but a G thing baby.,
Susu (Guest),
16-Jun-09 09:23 PM, #44
Wow, don't bother talking to him Iunna, dude belongs in...,
N b M (Guest),
16-Jun-09 09:26 PM, #46
You are just an idiot, sir. n/t,
Elhe (Guest),
17-Jun-09 04:12 AM, #61
go back to Eastern Road.~,
Aodh,
17-Jun-09 12:16 PM, #65
RE: Ain't nuthin' but a G thing baby.,
Iunna,
16-Jun-09 09:59 PM, #51
No need to be ambiguous,
Susu (Guest),
16-Jun-09 11:45 PM, #55
Not to fan any flames,
Mek (Guest),
17-Jun-09 12:20 AM, #58
RE: Not to fan any flames,
Susu (Guest),
17-Jun-09 12:26 AM, #59
RE: Not to fan any flames,
Splntrd,
17-Jun-09 05:18 PM, #72
RE: Not to fan any flames,
Daevryn,
17-Jun-09 05:24 PM, #73
RE: Not to fan any flames,
Susu (Guest),
17-Jun-09 11:47 PM, #77
One other thing,
Susu (Guest),
17-Jun-09 11:49 PM, #78
Yea, I agree with this post, for what it's worth. nt,
Stunna1 (Guest),
17-Jun-09 06:21 PM, #75
RE: No need to be ambiguous,
Nacklewig (Guest),
17-Jun-09 12:17 PM, #66
Response,
Ghrummin (Guest),
17-Jun-09 01:24 PM, #69
Incidentally, this wasn't the convo I was talking about...,
Iunna,
17-Jun-09 01:22 PM, #68
RE: (AGE DEATH) [BATTLE] Susubienko Glomska the Swift S...,
N b M (Guest),
16-Jun-09 08:47 PM, #38
RE: (AGE DEATH) [BATTLE] Susubienko Glomska the Swift S...,
Susu (Guest),
16-Jun-09 09:21 PM, #43
RE: (AGE DEATH) [BATTLE] Susubienko Glomska the Swift S...,
N b M (Guest),
16-Jun-09 09:24 PM, #45
Just wow, Lobo!! Man you used to be the Bane of nexus, ...,
Rogue,
16-Jun-09 08:49 PM, #39
WTF Graatch, how as a working did you play this much?,
Aeinrez (Guest),
16-Jun-09 09:04 PM, #40
RE: WTF Graatch, how as a working did you play this muc...,
Susu (Guest),
16-Jun-09 09:18 PM, #42
Good luck with the new job, man.,
Aeinrez (Guest),
16-Jun-09 09:27 PM, #47
RE: Good luck with the new job, man.,
Susu (Guest),
16-Jun-09 09:33 PM, #48
RE: Good luck with the new job, man.,
Susu (Guest),
16-Jun-09 09:34 PM, #49
sociopath meets angstyteen = susubienko vs tabius,
mageplayer (Guest),
16-Jun-09 09:37 PM, #50
Quiter,
Kjrorh (Guest),
16-Jun-09 11:38 PM, #54
RE: (AGE DEATH) [BATTLE] Susubienko Glomska the Swift S...,
Yean,
17-Jun-09 12:40 AM, #60
This is exactly why I try to avoid him,
N b M (Guest),
17-Jun-09 11:50 AM, #64
RE: (AGE DEATH) [BATTLE] Susubienko Glomska the Swift S...,
Susu (Guest),
18-Jun-09 12:00 AM, #80
I liked Susu for being a rager that people were worried...,
Abernytee (Guest),
17-Jun-09 06:25 AM, #62
Question for you,
Onlooker (Guest),
17-Jun-09 11:49 AM, #63
While my interactions with you are limited,
Taichabel (Guest),
17-Jun-09 01:59 PM, #70
RE: While my interactions with you are limited,
Susu (Guest),
17-Jun-09 11:51 PM, #79
Eh, no big deal.,
Khalla (Guest),
17-Jun-09 04:47 PM, #71
RE: Eh, no big deal.,
Susu (Guest),
18-Jun-09 12:04 AM, #81
No, sir. I don't like it.,
smashtroo (Guest),
16-Jun-09 06:48 PM, #33
sorry about the complaint,
Elenia (Guest),
16-Jun-09 06:01 PM, #32
RE: sorry about the complaint,
Susu (Guest),
16-Jun-09 09:18 PM, #41
Skilled at assassinate,
Gahdak (Guest),
16-Jun-09 04:16 PM, #30
That was a great fight.,
Malakhi (Guest),
16-Jun-09 04:30 PM, #31
Please do not waste our time with useless trolls on thi...,
Rayihn,
16-Jun-09 04:12 PM, #29
Nt - means No Text - and you,
Beront (Guest),
16-Jun-09 11:47 PM, #56
Bleh!,
Nacklewig (Guest),
16-Jun-09 01:32 PM, #28
It was,
Ahtieli2 (Guest),
16-Jun-09 11:45 AM, #24
You complete me. NT,
Evgeni Malkin (Guest),
16-Jun-09 11:47 AM, #25
Just because no one else has expounded on it yet.,
Raewol (Guest),
16-Jun-09 11:39 AM, #23
RE: Just because no one else has expounded on it yet.,
Daevryn,
16-Jun-09 01:03 PM, #27
A couple things:,
Iunna,
16-Jun-09 07:06 PM, #34
RE: (AGE DEATH) [BATTLE] Susubienko Glomska the Swift S...,
Lohik (Guest),
16-Jun-09 10:02 AM, #22
RE: (AGE DEATH) [BATTLE] Susubienko Glomska the Swift S...,
Susu (Guest),
18-Jun-09 12:06 AM, #82
RE: (AGE DEATH) [BATTLE] Susubienko Glomska the Swift S...,
Bartis (Guest),
16-Jun-09 09:31 AM, #21
Oh, and I forgot I found the Hammerhand comments pretty...,
Bartis (Guest),
16-Jun-09 12:00 PM, #26
grats,
Aodh,
16-Jun-09 08:39 AM, #20
Because I can't help myself...,
Aeinrez (Guest),
16-Jun-09 04:47 AM, #18
This character's PBF inspires morbid curiousity in me.....,
Aeinrez (Guest),
16-Jun-09 04:54 AM, #19
I won't lie, I didn't like you.,
Cimere (Guest),
16-Jun-09 03:39 AM, #17
RE: I won't lie, I didn't like you.,
Susu (Guest),
18-Jun-09 12:09 AM, #83
The little bird with the nasty beak...,
Arrna (Guest),
16-Jun-09 03:05 AM, #15
RE: The little bird with the nasty beak...,
Susu (Guest),
18-Jun-09 12:12 AM, #84
RE: (AGE DEATH) [BATTLE] Susubienko Glomska the Swift S...,
mageplayer (Guest),
16-Jun-09 02:24 AM, #14
What can I say.,
Malakhi (Guest),
16-Jun-09 12:22 AM, #9
Ahh, Su-su-subienko..,
Khalla (Guest),
16-Jun-09 01:20 AM, #10
I need to learn how to reply to the right message appar...,
Khalla (Guest),
16-Jun-09 01:25 AM, #11
Makes me feel good I was your first pk death.,
Thrallin (Guest),
16-Jun-09 12:11 AM, #7
Engurd has no talent,
CD (Guest),
16-Jun-09 12:16 AM, #8
Yhorian?,
Aeinrez (Guest),
15-Jun-09 10:55 PM, #5
RP wasn't good enough to be Yhorian. nt,
Forsakenz (Guest),
15-Jun-09 11:38 PM, #6
I'm sorry I thought this was you, Yhorian.,
Aeinrez (Guest),
16-Jun-09 02:14 AM, #12
I take back anything good I had to say about this char....,
Aeinrez (Guest),
16-Jun-09 02:15 AM, #13
Relax, look at his pk ratio, he sucked badly,
Beront (Guest),
16-Jun-09 03:10 AM, #16
RE: (AGE DEATH) [BATTLE] Susubienko Glomska the Swift S...,
Kalderseg (Guest),
15-Jun-09 10:53 PM, #4
Sqwakbeak!,
Ghrummin (Guest),
15-Jun-09 08:52 PM, #3
RE: Sqwakbeak!,
Susu (Guest),
18-Jun-09 12:16 AM, #85
RE: (AGE DEATH) [BATTLE] Susubienko Glomska the Swift S...,
Vythigor (Guest),
15-Jun-09 07:59 PM, #2
RE: (AGE DEATH) [BATTLE] Susubienko Glomska the Swift S...,
Susu (Guest),
18-Jun-09 12:22 AM, #86
Deadly. Good Villager.,
Woldrun (Guest),
15-Jun-09 07:53 PM, #1
RE: Deadly. Good Villager.,
Susu (Guest),
18-Jun-09 12:25 AM, #87
| |
|