Subject: "RE: Question on this as I am wondering if this has changed since 2003." Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions The Battlefield Topic #124867
Show all folders

YsaloeryeThu 16-Jul-15 11:19 AM
Member since 09th Apr 2006
315 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#124930, "RE: Question on this as I am wondering if this has changed since 2003."


  

          

So lets just clear somethings up on Parity and maybe it will help folks.

I think the smackdown of Fess when he attacked the ranking group, while not great, is somewhat acceptable. Enemy jumps on a wounded groupmate and gets mowed down. I would expect to see someone rescue though rather than trying to kill. And if it were a berserker who got attacked he should be pissed off.

The Eastern road incident is not acceptable. I always go with the Mantra that unless you are actively ranking, or cabal raiding, a group of ragers together should be autoassist off. For them not to be, and to actively or passively gang down an adversary is poor battle RP. If there is a berserker in the group he should be held to task, if he was the one attacked and the others autoassisted, he should be taking them to the circle for demeaning his code.

I've said it before, berserkers and leaders are held to a higher standard, but scouts and defenders who consistently gank will also be held to task.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

HOT Topic(CON LOSS) [BATTLE] Gogoth Nenzenoth the Legend of the ... [View all] , Death_Angel, Mon 13-Jul-15 11:15 AM
Reply Thanks for the combat., Luthantulas2 (Anonymous), 13-Jul-15 04:59 PM, #41
Reply RE: (CON LOSS) [BATTLE] Gogoth Nenzenoth the Legend of ..., Kregan (Anonymous), 16-Jul-15 05:14 PM, #32
Reply Liked you., Varaez (Anonymous), 13-Jul-15 12:28 PM, #4
Reply My thoughts., Verathi, 13-Jul-15 12:06 PM, #3
Reply Pretty much this. Was a fan too for a while, Yorzen (Anonymous), 13-Jul-15 12:57 PM, #5
Reply Question on this as I am wondering if this has changed ..., Polmier (Anonymous), 13-Jul-15 06:11 PM, #6
Reply This is pretty much the standard for me., Gaplemo, 13-Jul-15 06:39 PM, #7
Reply I don't think it's always the case, incognito, 14-Jul-15 01:55 AM, #10
     Reply Its pretty much the rule, not the exception., Gaplemo, 14-Jul-15 02:08 AM, #11
          Reply I do try to catch them unprepared, incognito, 14-Jul-15 04:04 PM, #17
Reply That is what I remembered as well., Rager Player (Anonymous), 13-Jul-15 06:45 PM, #8
Reply I do not think that Verathi is learning. I am just aski..., Polmier (Anonymous), 13-Jul-15 07:02 PM, #9
Reply RE: That is what I remembered as well., Verathi, 14-Jul-15 09:14 AM, #13
     Reply No heat from me meant., Polmier (Anonymous), 14-Jul-15 10:59 AM, #16
Reply RE: Question on this as I am wondering if this has chan..., Verathi, 14-Jul-15 08:57 AM, #12
Reply I think you handled the Gogoth thing extremely well., Gaplemo, 14-Jul-15 10:13 AM, #14
Reply Thanks for the followup, Polmier (Anonymous), 14-Jul-15 10:58 AM, #15
Reply RE: Question on this as I am wondering if this has chan..., Ysaloerye, 16-Jul-15 11:19 AM #20
     Reply Followup:, Varaez (Anonymous), 16-Jul-15 12:18 PM, #21
     Reply Just a quick thought, Destuvius, 16-Jul-15 12:27 PM, #22
     Reply Biased non battle imm opinions are why we are having th..., Lhydia, 16-Jul-15 12:38 PM, #23
     Reply Destuvius' response is generally pretty accurate., Jormyr, 23-Jul-15 04:17 AM, #40
     Reply RE: Just a quick thought, Varaez (Anonymous), 16-Jul-15 12:40 PM, #24
          Reply RE: Just a quick thought, Destuvius, 16-Jul-15 12:47 PM, #26
          Reply Uhh, Lhydia, 16-Jul-15 12:53 PM, #27
          Reply Open forum, Tsunami, 16-Jul-15 06:08 PM, #34
          Reply RE: Just a quick thought, N b M, 16-Jul-15 01:01 PM, #28
          Reply RE: Just a quick thought, Verathi, 16-Jul-15 01:39 PM, #29
               Reply Follow up point for clarification since we are on the t..., TJHuron, 16-Jul-15 02:14 PM, #30
               Reply I really like the Verathi response and reasoning, laxman, 16-Jul-15 03:18 PM, #31
               Reply I really do too, TJHuron, 16-Jul-15 06:01 PM, #33
               Reply RE: Follow up point for clarification since we are on t..., Verathi, 17-Jul-15 08:52 AM, #37
               Reply Dude you've got this. n/t, Helper (Anonymous), 17-Jul-15 10:25 AM, #38
               Reply Ysal Wisdom, Ysaloerye, 17-Jul-15 10:35 AM, #39
               Reply I apologize to the imms for bringing this up., Polmier (Anonymous), 16-Jul-15 07:09 PM, #36
     Reply Seems backwards, Tsunami, 16-Jul-15 12:43 PM, #25
     Reply Thanks to both of you for clearing this up. , Polmier (Anonymous), 16-Jul-15 07:04 PM, #35
Reply You give thoughts? (And a story to talk about), Lararani (Anonymous), 15-Jul-15 03:26 AM, #18
     Reply RE: You give thoughts? (And a story to talk about), Verathi, 15-Jul-15 08:56 AM, #19
Reply Kind of figured this was coming., Varnon (Anonymous), 13-Jul-15 11:49 AM, #2
Reply You were a great enemy to have, Aufang (Anonymous), 13-Jul-15 11:47 AM, #1
Top General Discussions The Battlefield Topic #124867 Previous topic | Next topic