Go
back to previous topic |
Forum Name |
Gameplay |
Topic subject | Growing more confident in Shifter Form |
Topic
URL | https://forums.carrionfields.com/dcboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=6&topic_id=43570 |
43570, Growing more confident in Shifter Form
Posted by Dragomir on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
I have two questions now that I am trying to come back after three years off. Great to see the Fields still going strong btw and have been reading up on a lot of the changes. I looking forward to playing again.
One: Is how quickly you grow more confident in a form as a shifter aided at all by the new bonus to learning that has been put in? The one dependent on how many players are logged in.
Two: How come growing more confident does not give you exp like improving a skill or spell would? It would seem that it would be the same thing as improving in second attack, etc.
|
43693, RE: Growing more confident in Shifter Form
Posted by Daevryn on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
>One: Is how quickly you grow more confident in a form as a >shifter aided at all by the new bonus to learning that has >been put in? The one dependent on how many players are logged >in.
I don't think so but I haven't looked at the code.
>Two: How come growing more confident does not give you exp >like improving a skill or spell would? It would seem that it >would be the same thing as improving in second attack, etc.
Because they're not skills or spells? :)
I don't have a strong opinion either way on this issue.
|
43696, RE: Growing more confident in Shifter Form
Posted by Dragomir on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
> >I don't think so but I haven't looked at the code.
It actually seemed like I learned better without the bonus, but that could very well be RNG or my complete incompetence ;)
> > >Because they're not skills or spells? :) > >I don't have a strong opinion either way on this issue.
Just thought it might be a nice small perk. maybe I'll try Santa Zulg 2012!
Thanks!!
|
43689, Not official, but...
Posted by Tac on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
>I have two questions now that I am trying to come back after >three years off. Great to see the Fields still going strong >btw and have been reading up on a lot of the changes. I >looking forward to playing again. > >One: Is how quickly you grow more confident in a form as a >shifter aided at all by the new bonus to learning that has >been put in? The one dependent on how many players are logged >in.
Probably not at all, and since it isn't that hard, and takes like 20 minutes of being in form while ranking... who cares?
>Two: How come growing more confident does not give you exp >like improving a skill or spell would? It would seem that it >would be the same thing as improving in second attack, etc.
It isn't a skill, or is a hidden skill they don't want people tracking so they never bothered. You are looking at something like a max of 1k exp per form. Not likely to be worth the effort.
|
43694, RE: Not official, but...
Posted by Dragomir on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
> >Probably not at all, and since it isn't that hard, and takes >like 20 minutes of being in form while ranking... who cares? >
It almost seemed like it was reversed in my experience. I seemed to grow more confident quicker when there was no learning bonus, which prompted the question.
> >It isn't a skill, or is a hidden skill they don't want people >tracking so they never bothered. You are looking at something >like a max of 1k exp per form. Not likely to be worth the >effort.
I remember a loong time ago it was changed so that confident basically meant 100%. People use to notice, even after they became confident, they would still improve in the form. That, to me, means it is a skill. Yes, it is a small amount of exp, but I would be curious why it would be treated any differently from other ones.
|
43695, RE: Not official, but...
Posted by Daevryn on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Mechanically, it's not a skill.
I'm talking guts of the mud code here.
|
43697, RE: Not official, but...
Posted by Dragomir on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
>Mechanically, it's not a skill. > >I'm talking guts of the mud code here.
Really? interesting. my former programmer self is curious as to what the difference is in the code, but I am still recovering and do not really think I should find out... I'll stick with my routers and switches.
|
43677, really? nothing?
Posted by Dragomir on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Not even a smart @$$ answer? I checked the older posts and could not find the answer. It is not like I am asking anything super secret. I even started out with a nice compliment to try and garner some good will for an answer... and I got nothing...
That hurts a bit.
|
43685, Here is your answer:
Posted by Batman on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Hi, how are you today?
|
43687, Ha!
Posted by Dragomir on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Sorry, just thought they were legit questions and no one could even both answering. Kind of annoying. But thanks for the smart @$$ response! Now if I can get Nep to give the real answer my day will be complete!
Edited to add:
And my day has been long already, if you could not tell from my post, but thanks for asking!
|