Go back to previous topic
Forum Name Gameplay
Topic subjecta warrior version of Trance
Topic URLhttps://forums.carrionfields.com/dcboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=6&topic_id=3940
3940, a warrior version of Trance
Posted by Abthalok on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Aight, I think all classes get fast heal and mediatation right?
Only some mage classes get trance, why not give some warrior classes an enhanced version of fast healing?
3970, Because it would duplicate a legacy that can be chosen? nt
Posted by Vladamir on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
nt
3947, RE: a warrior version of Trance
Posted by Zulghinlour on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
>Aight, I think all classes get fast heal and mediatation right?
>Only some mage classes get trance, why not give some warrior
>classes an enhanced version of fast healing?

Because we don't think they need it.
3942, RE: a warrior version of Trance
Posted by Gaenlin on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
>Aight, I think all classes get fast heal and mediatation
>right?
>Only some mage classes get trance, why not give some warrior
>classes an enhanced version of fast healing?

Whispers of the Great Siege.

To stack something else on top of this would be ridiculous, comparable to giving the dwarf healer with slow even more hp regeneration.

Warriors already have enough, seriously. The enhanced reflexes thing might actually make them too good.
3941, RE: a warrior version of Trance
Posted by Phaistus on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
>Aight, I think all classes get fast heal and mediatation
>right?
>Only some mage classes get trance, why not give some warrior
>classes an enhanced version of fast healing?

All warrior classes get a form of fast healing already. For rangers it is called herbs. For warriors it is called berserk. Not to mention there is a legacy that gives you super fast healing and warriors already benefit from a greater hp bonus at hero and greater hp bonuses of their mage counterpart of the same race.
3943, RE: a warrior version of Trance
Posted by Abthalok on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Thats part of my point.

For one, whispers has more affects then just a boon to regen, its not really a replacement for what I was thinking of, since it narrows your chocies down so much. All I'm saying is that it takes a hell of a long time for any warrior to regen 1000 hps than it takes most mages to regen 1000 mana.
3944, RE: a warrior version of Trance
Posted by Gaenlin on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
>Thats part of my point.
>
>For one, whispers has more affects then just a boon to regen,
>its not really a replacement for what I was thinking of, since
>it narrows your chocies down so much. All I'm saying is that
>it takes a hell of a long time for any warrior to regen 1000
>hps than it takes most mages to regen 1000 mana.

Hit points and mana aren't equal. One is required, the other is not, necessarily. If it takes a long time for you to regenerate 1000 hp as a warrior, consider that as a mage, a hero shapeshifter will often get about 100 hp/round out of form. What's that, ten rounds or so? That's with slow, too.

3945, RE: warrior healing
Posted by Sevarecan on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
>Thats part of my point.
>
>For one, whispers has more affects then just a boon to regen,
>its not really a replacement for what I was thinking of, since
>it narrows your chocies down so much. All I'm saying is that
>it takes a hell of a long time for any warrior to regen 1000
>hps than it takes most mages to regen 1000 mana.

In my opinion, giving more standard healing abilities to warriors
would impact the role of transmuters/healers/etc. Warriors can
make the legacy choice if they feel strongly about rapid healing,
and the benefit/cost of that choice is reasonable.




3946, comparing mana to hp is like comparing........
Posted by Phaistus on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Apples to bicycle pumps


Hp is far far far more important than mana and warriors have better healing/hp than any mage.


You dont die when you run out of mana.
3971, In some situations yes you do. nt
Posted by Astillian on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
> You dont die when you run out of mana.