Go
back to previous topic |
Forum Name |
Gameplay |
Topic subject | Anyone else feel like they are degrading themselves by playing certain things? |
Topic
URL | https://forums.carrionfields.com/dcboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=6&topic_id=35869 |
35869, Anyone else feel like they are degrading themselves by playing certain things?
Posted by Pro on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
I don't like to play Conjies/Shifters/Assassins or arial anything because I feel like they are just too easy to play.
I'm not saying I would do great with them, but I generally think of them as classes that require little effort to play or in the case of arials, something that is sort of too good.
|
35901, Nope
Posted by DurNominator on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
If you aren't continuously playing same character type over and over again and winning with the same tricks every time, you should't have a reason to feel that you're degrading yourself by playing some combo. If the combo is possible, Imms have worked to make it balanced, at least to some extent.
|
35896, I'm curious Pro (not trying to flame or anything.)
Posted by Amberion on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Have you had any chars that have been successful PK-wise? I can't seem to remember any at all. (Any of your chars at all that is.)
And looking at the stats, they don't back your claim up. But to some extent I agree, arial warriors for me feels super easy to play at hero range. Conjurer, never had one so no idea, shifters, had 2 complete failures, not my cup of tea, assassin, had one that was AWESOME at midlevels, not so much at hero...
|
35902, I've had more than I can remember.
Posted by Pro on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
But I tend to delete after losing so I don't wrack up huge counts with any one character.
|
35906, So the answer was no. n/t
Posted by Lhydia on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
gr
|
35936, I challenge you. Play a char over 200 hours. nt
Posted by DurNominator on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
nt
|
35891, I think there's a miscommunication here
Posted by elmeri_ on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
I think what you actually mean is that your examples aren't so much better, just more convenient than others. It doesn't mean that their power peak high, just that if you have a eagle/lion it's kind of hard to do really bad. When as with an AP you can be scary as hell or a complete pushover just as easily.
All the combos you suggested, conjie (I assume you mean goodie), shifter, arial warrior and assassin usually do ok, especially at some lvl range or aspect of the end game, but really lack the raw punch of real power combos (like giant sword).
|
35890, Have you had one successful character? n/t
Posted by Lhydia on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
gr
|
35887, No
Posted by Meizi_M on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Something being too easy to play is the dumbest thing I've heard in a while.
|
35889, Out of Curiosity.
Posted by Pro on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Who the #### are you?
|
35892, A player out there whom you trolled to create an account.
Posted by DurNominator on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
That's my guess anyway. I can't think why anyone would bother to make a second account just to respond to you. Let's welcome the M fellow to the forum and not be ####s, shall we?
|
35893, I'm not sure if you realize what a DB you are.
Posted by Pro on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
And by DB I mean insignificant.
You're cut off.
|
35900, I am absolutely certain...
Posted by vargal on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
That you don't realize how big of an ignorant and annoying DB you are. I really wish those were grounds for a ban on these forums, because I'm really tired of seeing insipid posts with your handle next to them.
|
35903, Here's the deal man. I post. They flame.
Posted by Pro on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
It's not my fault that you're too lazy to track a thread back to the source.
|
35934, Its because you're trolling the boards on purpose and filling them with useless nonsense. You're really losing it lately. Did the movie not work out? n/t
Posted by Lhydia on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
gr
|
35932, OH NO! PRO IS CUTTING DUR OFF!!!! THE HUMANITY.
Posted by TMNS on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Sometimes I just wish you'd decide Afghanistan needs a bounty hunter.
|
35898, RE: Out of Curiosity.
Posted by Meizi_M on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Ah yes. The good old ad hominem.
|
35899, Well, yeah. Duhhhhhh.~
Posted by blackbird on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
.
|
35904, Except, that wasn't an ad hominem. Not even close. n/t
Posted by Pro on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
vasdv
|
35935, Yes, it was. Pretty close at least.
Posted by DurNominator on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Explanation for those who still read my posts:
M makes an account to post that he finds Pro's notion of CF having an overpowered combo ridiculous. Pro responds with a "who the #### are you?". I think that's an ad hominem argument since it is targeted to the person, not the opinion. Proper way to counter the post would be to respond to M's point, which is easy, since M brings nothing to the table, just his opinion. Simple "how come" would have sufficed to lead the conversation back to the topic.
Anyway, M, if you're reading this, I'd like to hear your answers to the following questions:
1) How come?
2) Are you someone new to the forum or someone who has been here before with another account? (I kinda wonder who guessed right)
|
35944, RE: Yes, it was. Pretty close at least.
Posted by Meizi_M on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
1) In competitive multiplayer pvp environment nothing is mechanically 'easy'. Winning is easy only if you are much better than everybody else, which has nothing to do with game mechanics.
2) No, yes.
Trolling Pro anonymously is lots of fun but I made this account before I read the post because I forgot my password and the respective email account has expired long time ago.
And you guys are ####s.
|
35945, There is definitely "relative ease" when comparing 2 char builds
Posted by Artificial on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
IE necromancer vs rager pincersvirf
if necro wants to kill skilled guy, he has to formulate plans ahead of time, know locked rooms etc before he has a chance to land that sweet kill
pincersvirf has to formula his plan of pincer or pincer or pincer and hope deathblow goes off.
|
35883, RE: Anyone else feel like they are degrading themselves by playing certain things?
Posted by Drag0nSt0rm on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
The number of successful arial chars would be far higher if that were true. Same goes for Conjurers and assassins. But really, they are pretty average.
|
35884, I was thinking there were more top ranked Arials warriors than even giant sword specs. n/t
Posted by Pro on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
dhsrh
|
35886, RE: I was thinking there were more top ranked Arials warriors than even giant sword specs. n/t
Posted by MRSK on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
There are two arial warriors in top 10 based by PKW. And 5 giant swords. Only 3 arials in top 35. That your point doesn't stand.
|
35888, Great! I can play a bird without feeling guilty! n/t
Posted by Pro on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
fg
|
35880, Or you could #### off.
Posted by Pro on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Because I just asked if anyone shares that sentiment. Not if anyone wants to ignore what I posted in the body of the message and fire back at me.
Meant for Isildur.
|
35881, RE: Or you could #### off.
Posted by Isildur on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Okay. No, I don't feel that way. Because I don't think these classes are unstoppable power combos. I encourage you to explore whether your perception matches reality by actually playing some of them.
|
35885, I have.
Posted by Pro on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Bit cranky sorry.
|
35877, No, here is why:
Posted by Tsunami on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
I still suck as those things too ;).
I haven't really tried "power combos" like giant sword or whatever, but I'm pretty certain I can make them look really terrible.
|
35875, RE: Anyone else feel like they are degrading themselves by playing certain things?
Posted by Isildur on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
For kicks, since they're just too easy to play, play one and show us how badass you can be.
|