Shouldn't these affect your weight?

i.e. if you enlarge, your gear weighs that much more.
If you reduce, it weighs less.

This has implications for bash, disarm, etc.

>Shouldn't these affect your weight?

No.

>i.e. if you enlarge, your gear weighs that much more.
>If you reduce, it weighs less.

So a 2 pound belt shoudl weight different if a gnome wears it or a giant wears it? It's still a 2 pound belt.

>This has implications for bash, disarm, etc.

Size already has implications for bash.

but since both gnome and giant can wear it anyway, I guess that's where we suspend disbelief.

However, should reduced giants be able to wear giant only gear, or enlarged gnomes gnome only gear?

Just a thought. Not really suggesting anything changes.

In my opinion, it would be a large change for an effect that doesn't add much (and would subtract in many ways... I enlarge you, and now you can't pick up disarmed weapons because your gear weighs 600 pounds) to game play.

valguarnera@carrionfields.com

If you grow a size your max strength should also increase, which would offset the increased weight from your gear.

There's also the issue of whether a reduced guy can bash as well as before he reduced, weightwise.

ie two giants reduce should bash each other less effectively than 2 giants enlarged, maybe.

It's easier to explain it with changed volume/maintained weight. Aka the density changes.

Why change what is not broken?