Go back to previous topic
Forum Name Gameplay
Topic subjectRE: Some recent players and their stats prove you wrong.
Topic URLhttps://forums.carrionfields.com/dcboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=6&topic_id=19548&mesg_id=19603
19603, RE: Some recent players and their stats prove you wrong.
Posted by Lyristeon on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
>Teutonium - 44 mage kills, 45 mage deaths. Warrior.
>Villager
>Jutunn - 54 mage kills, 18 mage deaths. Bard.
>Cheap Bard.
>Yazhmog - 21 mage kills, 0 mage deaths. Orc.
>Don't know this one
>Begelrut - 51 mage kills, 1 mage death. Warrior.
>Villager
>Brinkmun - 80 mage kills, 28 mage deaths. Warrior
>Villager
>Queliryon - 27 mage kills, 1 mage death. Warrior.
>Don't know this one, prolly a villager

Search is overpowered on the PBF. Elven warrior in Fortress.

>Jichii - 44 mage kills, 16 mage deaths. Bard.
>Villager
>Dyrin - 13 mage kills, 6 mage deaths. Warrior.
>This is a good ratio
>Ktaar - 32 mage kills, 2 mage deaths. Assassin.
>Equipped to kill mages, even unscratchable ones with one
>assassinate
>Iia - 36 mage kills, 11 mage deaths. Druid
>Priests are supposed to be bad ass, they deserve it. Notice
>the number of deaths though
>Drezen - 19 mage kills, 3 mage deaths. Warrior.
>
>Hunsobo - 44 mage kills, 7 mage deaths. Warrior.
>Super Power Players with full sets of elite gear not
>included.

Maybe that mage is a super power player with elite gear...does that make it different for you or are you now supporting what I originally stated?

>Dizrug - 14 mage kills, 2 mage deaths. Warrior
>Don't know this one either
>Alarith - 22 mage kills, 2 mage deaths. Assassin.
>Never heard of this one
>This just tells me that you haven't achieved this level of
>knowledge and skill, not that anything is overpowered.
>
>
>Let's do a count-8 Warriors, 2 Assassin, 1 priest, 2 Bards, 0
>Thieves, 0 Rangers and no accounting for what happened after
>level 41. How come there aren't any rangers on that list? Also
>at least four were villagers who have been equiped to better
>stop mages. Spellbane's a #####.

This list could get much larger, I just did a very quick and brief search of the last three months of players who have a PBF. Anybody can do it. If you had done it, you would realize that your post is kind of ridiculous. Spellbane is not all you think it is. Try playing a villager before you claim they are all that. But, just for giggles, here are some rangers that I know of off the top of my head that weren't villagers who seemed to have some solid game knowledge.

Nreisshe - 87 mage kills, 1 mage death. Ranger
Derasori - You will have to see for yourself if the PBF comes out. Ranger
Krynna - 31 mage kills, 6 mage deaths. Ranger
>
>I'm sorry, I fail to see your actual point. Killing mages at
>level 11-30 is NOT hard if you have a good set of gear or know
>how to bash.
>
>Got that list for APs? How about Rangers? How about rangers
>WITHOUT scrolls and or bearcharge?
And, how about all of the stats for mages who killed without using all of their spells and skills and how about all of the immortals who kill without using slay and all of the bunnies that don't use their lucky feet?
>
>This brings me to another argument. If ONLY the elite veteran
>players can do it, is it REALLY balanced?

Yes, it is balanced because the numbers for mages are just as equal. And I am sure if you reread everything you posted and take out all the ifs ands and buts of this thread, you will see that the balance is as good as it has ever been.