>Is it possible to start:
>1. With coding, not building?
>2. Without being ava...ava...avatarazing (avatared?)
>3. Code some task, that Zulg gives to
>4. Without any obligations.
>
>So, just to get the task and code it...or, well, do not code
>it.

1) Why should we trust you with our code?

2) Why would we want staff "without obligations"? So if we assign you something there's no guarantee you'll ever work on it?

3) In general, we want well-rounded staff. Even if you had the access, if you haven't demonstrated an understanding of how the game runs (building an area is a very good check of this), you're likely to build code that doesn't work well within the game, either stylistically, or mechanically.

valguarnera@carrionfields.com