Go back to previous topic
Forum Name New Player Q&A
Topic subjectSorry you don't make much sense to me
Topic URLhttps://forums.carrionfields.com/dcboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=5&topic_id=12&mesg_id=53
53, Sorry you don't make much sense to me
Posted by ArChaos on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
A: since when were forum nicks, previous characters?


>I fail to see how parry
>is ultra-important to perfect for
>a warrior, but is irrelevant
>for a necromancer who fights
>solo often.

word of recall and aura,shield, barrier
plus, oh zombies that can rescue...



>One of the disadvantages of a
>low int/wis class is that
>the abilities will improve more
>slowly. If you can't
>tank Maddie, tank something a
>couple levels down for a
>while.

This is where you really freaking confuse me? I'm already getting 30 exp for killing maddie, how much lower can i go, and how can i possibly go lower yet learn my skills, the whole point of your change is that i don't do that?????????


> If you really
>feel that your dodge/parry levels
>are what is holding your
>character back, tank some semi-tough
>mobs on your own for
>a while.

THATS MY WHOLE POINT! THEY CAN'T!
Maddie is for rank 16's for goodness sake, how the hell is the orc supposed to handle "semi-tough" when he's already getting beaten silly by "child-like" mobs??
Plus throw in for example the 50% wimpy and i'm laughing.
Please can you give me a detailed explanation to the situation i am so obviously missing

> Sometimes you'll
>hit tough streaks where things
>don't improve,

11 hours

> but the code
>affects a lot less than
>the things you claimed in
>your post.

So why change it?

> Also, orcs
>aren't warriors. They're much
>more of a utility class
>than you are giving them
>credit for, and comparing the
>two isn't very accurate.

no, the fact that they tank pathetically and are unable to get an opportunity to practice is the point at hand



>I agree with Trewyn, Scar, Kah,
>and others above: You can
>do just fine without stopping
>to practice in the grand
>scheme of things, mage or
>not. Too many counterexamples
>from recent characters exist to
>not take that viewpoint very
>seriously. I've checked out
>some informed opinions on this,
>from people who have recently
>played giants and such, and
>the myth that a fighting-type
>class is dead in the
>water without 100% everything is
>just that.

again, your spewing extremes here, i don't want 100% in everything, you keep repeating this non desired scenario as some sort of defence.


>My advice is to try sticking
>it out. See how
>your character stacks up in
>PK situations, and whether or
>not your abilities don't hit
>high levels just by running
>around doing your regular thing.
> I think you'll find
>that your character will do
>a lot better than you
>think.

I did, my characters rp went right down the swanee as a respectable warrior when he died in every single confrontation with a necromancer (Within 2 rounds i might add) i swallowed the "don't practice" line and lost gads of con in a stupidly short length of time, it's happened every time i've done it. Mages just abuse you.

In fact i challenge you to make a rager warrior without practicing your skills -at- all and you can prove me wrong, but until you name one, i'm sorry but i don't believe you.